To: Mighty Mizzou who wrote (56329 ) 10/21/1998 1:42:00 PM From: The Phoenix Respond to of 61433
The Lunchtime News Oct 21, 1998 FOOL PLATE SPECIAL An Investment Opinion by Dale Wettlaufer Ascend Loan Reserve Questions Network access and switching systems provider Ascend Communications (Nasdaq:ASND - news) gets the award for this quarter's most confusing earnings report! We congratulate it for this award for its third quarter earnings release made on Monday evening and which is still the topic of heated discussion on Internet message boards. First, let's deal with the unusual items that have attracted so much attention. There were four discrete items, three that reduced earnings and one that increased earnings. The charges were a $5 million patent agreement payment, a $7 million write-down of an old receivable, and an $8.7 million reserve against loans given to customers this quarter. The credit to earnings was an $18.3 million reversal of earlier merger expense accruals (from the Cascade deal). Some people have focused on comments from Paul Johnson of CS First Boston. Johnson looks at the company as having earned $0.30 per share for the quarter rather than $0.32. Here's why: Johnson takes out two of the charges as well as the credit to earnings and leaves the $8.7 million write-down in the operating earnings. So, we add back to reported pre-tax earnings of $102.444 million the $5 million patent payment and the $7 million write-off of the old receivable and we deduct from the reported pre-tax earnings the $18.279 unwinding of the earlier accrual. Therefore, pre-tax earnings with all the stuff scrubbed out are $96.165 million. Apply the 35.5% tax rate and you get net income of $62.026 million. Using the diluted share count, EPS was $0.2975, or $0.30 per share. Much attention has been paid to the issue of the company's accounting, with CEO Mory Ejabat telling Dow Jones that Wall Street doesn't understand the accounting issues involved in yesterday's report. However, it is strange that the company says these are good credits, yet the revenues from the sale of equipment to these customers are being deferred. It's a generally accepted accounting principle that revenues should be recognized when realized or realizable. Revenues are realized or realizable when either cash is received or claims to cash that can be converted into a known amount of cash are received from the customer. The company has claims to cash and believes that the credits are good, ergo these sales should be realized with a credit loss provision (expense) matching the company's estimates on what loans will actually go bad. You can be overconservative with revenue recognition. It's nowhere near as much of a sin as being too aggressive, but a company should make its best efforts to estimate exposures in lending. My conjecture is that the analysts believe the company is managing revenues and earnings too heavily. In addition, Ascend went out of its way to emphasize that the working capital loan program is new, yet Mory Ejabat said yesterday that it is continuing accounting treatments that have been in effect since 1993. If the company is that conservative, why did a write-off of a receivable from 1996 and early 1997 come through the income statement this quarter? A company that is really consistent would have reserved against that specific account long ago, with the ultimate write-off not affecting the income statement today but in the actual quarter when the reserve was taken. Analysts and investors just want a little transparency on what is going into and coming out of the deferred revenue accounts, what the working capital loans are, what the reserves are, and what is happening in general with how the company is using its resources. None of this is to say that this is why the stock was down yesterday -- it was down for other
reasons having to do with the sales and profitability outlook. Perhaps the most telling comment came out of Paul Johnson of BankBoston Robertson Stephens in his report yesterday: "The company's financial performance, as measured by its return on invested capital (ROIC), declined slightly in the quarter; in light of the increased level of competition in the market, we suspect that we may never see the company's historical performance achieved again." Ouch. Wondering why the stock was down now?