Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SnakeInATuxedo who wrote (8053)	10/22/1998 6:38:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Warning: The following post of mine here, contains some babble. CL, the Only, the only activity being done by GPGI is to get a handle on that bouncing football that represents the current unstable state of the company. The "an official Web site presence" would be greatly appreciated(needed) by the shareholders on this thread, but to the management of GPGI, "where its happening" is at the work site, and they have decided, that with Mike, there would be too many cooks in the kitchen right now to try to include any more non-employee help. One could argue that those on the work site have the best picture and understanding of what has, is and is now currently happening, and the views on this thread are speculation. And maby those on the work site are too close to the problem and do not have a clear focus on what is really there. Its possible that the current (whatever it is) problem cannot be fixed by current methods because the current is only a continuation of the past methods. I wish this thread would speculate what the time frame will be before the next /get dirt/process dirt/send to Sabra/wait for cash/ happens. As the steps before the "actual events" in the above sentence happen, it seems that until the process is tried for real, that no matter what GPGI says in an official or unoffical way, no one will put much faith in it since past info has not held up in some important cases. GPGI gives me the impression that current activity at the work site to them look good, that they feel that the problems of the recent past have been reconized and deal with in a manner to correct them. To me this means that the process works, from collecting the dirt to putting it in a form ready to ship to Sabrin. As if they fumbled the ball going from research to product, but the players on the team are ok and all know how to do their jobs, but they didn't have a coach or someone to instruct them on how to transfer the ball from research to production, and on the handoff(handover), fumble. Maby all the figures and facts on this thread from past gpgi report and rumors are not important. Maby its a black/white yes/no of a can or cannot current GPGI management get it right this next time. If they can, you all shareholders win. GPGI wins. If they can't, then it will be time for GPGI to bring in a person to identify what the problem is. I wonder how long until another real type product try will be made. Doug