Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s martin who wrote (52689)	10/22/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

Don't you know how moot your post is? No one was "duped" because each person alone is responsible for their stock purchases. Which is something everyone seems to realize - except you. And your post is mostly moot because, well, it comes from you. It is also moot because, by your definition, someone simply saying they've bought a stock is hype. How utterly ridiculous. Tonto bought - and "pumped" - why aren't you jumping all over him? You shoot your mouth off so venomously often, it looks like you've forgotten how to add any appropriate perspective whatsoever, if you ever did in the first place. And just why are you still here anyway? If you're so sure it is fraudulent and not going to trade, why don't you just slip back under that rock you crawled out from under? There must be hundreds of BB stocks you can find to bash and spew your special brand of venom on. And, out of all the responses posted to you, why have you posted back to only me? Reeks of kugie's attitude toward women (posters). Did your post come straight from his mouth? Or is that kugie posting from your account? Hmm? To get back to your "point", hype, according to you, is someone posting anything good or positive about the/a stock at all. You have no clue how absurd that is, do you? Of course those, in any stock, think and post "cheerleading" comments and/or info. DUH!!! I suppose, in your book, any person who buys a stock isn't supposed to anything at all unless it's bad. What a stupid attitude you have. You've stretched the concept of "hype" into something it isn't. >> BTW did you "contribute" to round 2 ? Wasn't the money from the sale of quarter stock supposed to give them the money to do their financials so you could trade again? << Worried? Is that why you're still here Mike?

To: s martin who wrote (52689)	10/22/1998 2:25:00 PM
From: BORIS BADENUFF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

dailywav.com You are responding to this message from s martin on Oct 22 1998 9:21AM EST >>You actually take pleasure in someone's else's troubles or loss of money. You are sick. << If I took pleasure in seeing innocent people duped into losing their money, I'd be on your team Ellen. Hypesters like RMIL had are simply people who hope to profit from their lies. They never intend to hold onto the stock they hype, they hope to sell into the hype they create. In the case of RMIL it seems it backfired. The intended "victims" bailed out and the hypesters got stuck. That's the best that can happen in a fraudulent situation, IMO . BTW did you "contribute" to round 2 ? Wasn't