Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Source Media SRCM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (1373)	10/22/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: Pluvia	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3015

This is Mike's (MW, currently suspended for using foul language and displaying low IQ), chance to prove how stupid I am.... I like people to show me how I just fell off the turnip truck, so I welcome Mike's response - which he can make on YHOO if he'd like. These four questions are those he posed to me and like an idiot - I answered them... <<<1. IT Network makes two excellent announcements involving Nynex and pluvia spins them to be irrelevent.>>> Please provide information indicating the value SRCM will be provided - in terms of revenue. Mike instead of taking the bait like a big carp, and getting all excited over nothing, please show that this is not just more SRCM BS HYPE as I have said it is... Show me the revenue this provides Mike... <<<2. IT Network signs a deal with Astra Pharmaceuticals , again irrelevent>>> Yes Mike it is irrelevant. But here's your chance to prove me wrong... Please show the value to SRCM in terms of revenue. Again don't be a 185 lb carp Mike - prove this is not more SRCM hype. I know the approximate value of this contract, it is tiny - which is why SRCM did not disclose details in the announcement. INcidently Mike, this is the oldest con in the book. It goes like this: Use big, well know companies in your press releases to associate your company with the big names. Bottom line? Value in terms of revenue. In this case its a joke. Wake up buddy. Show me the revenue Mike, prove this aint HYPE. <<<3. SRCM is GRANTED A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by a FEADERAL judge in FEDERAL COURT against the ex brite renegades and stevieboy calls this insignificant and points to a MOTION that was thrown out in a case in Kansas as being much more important.>>> Mike, Mike, Mike... The KS lawsuit determines if IMS was able to take and do business with the $25.9 million worth of customers who left SRCM. IMS has essentially won this suit, thus SRCM has lost $25.9 million and now cannot get it back. Gee call me crazy, but $25.9 million seems like a lot to lose? The MI suit is over easily reproduced scripts and catalogs - which IMS has already replaced and is no longer using. While it appears SRCM has won this suit - are you suggesting these scrips/catalogs are worth more than $25.9 million bucks? If so, I think you are clearly the biggest carp in this pond, as I don't think even the staunchest bulls would stand behind that stupidity. <<<4. SRCM signs a carriage agreement with Insight Cable for the first and so far only deployment of digital service by ANYONE in the industry and pluvia responds by claiming it will never happen.>>> Oh yea - you mean the deal where they haven't even determined what Insight will pay them? That deal? Gee, when did they claim that deal was made? Over 3 months ago? Sounds like the Insight deal is pretty solid. I'm sure it'll be a block buster source of revenue for SRCM. So that we all know just how important this INsigt deal is to SRCM - and how smart you are Mike - please tell us in terms of revenue what this INsight deal will mean to SRCM. Now there are 4 questions for you Mike, and answers to all four of your questions. Feel free to show me how stupid I am by answering my questions. I'm waiting for you with some a them balls of cheese whiz, please let me know if you prefer worms. All comments IMO Cheers Your Buddy Steve