Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: matt fahy who wrote (23126)	10/22/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45548

Oink, Oink, I'm a pig for another day. 33 3/8x 33 1/2 (rt); COMS AT 33 1/2 I like when I see those large spreads:-) kudos to Steve Porter..."33 resistance no big deal" Matt, RE: fore merger rumors It is probably true that Fore is undervalued in relation to the Berkely purchase. COMS has been living with a similar problem for a while; perceived weakness when there is real value. Seems that to convince the market otherwise, improved earnings need to be seen, or some big news of big contract, etc. Possibly, Fore went down because the rest of the market was going down as when COMS revisited 25 or so. Stocks right now are going up because of the rate-cut phenomenon, IMO. So, it makes it hard to know if Fore is going up due to rumors or a better market. All, I'm saying is that if I suspect a stock is going up from primarily rumors, then that's not good. That's why I don't really like these COMS rumors...besides the fact that they are a bunch of BS, IMO, it's harder to tell why it's going up or down. joe