SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lazarre who wrote (10784)10/28/1998 11:07:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 67261
 
LaBizarre is a committed Leftist. Question: should he ever be released?

Demonized for foiling a
left-wing plot


By Arnaud de Borchgrave

Augusto Pinochet brought three years of Marxist-led
misrule in Chile to a bloody end in 1973 -- and the
Western progressive intelligentsia never forgave him. If the
Chilean strongman, now under arrest in London, had
overthrown neo-Nazis instead of communists, he would have
earned the everlasting gratitude of western liberals, irrespective
of how many thousands had been killed to establish his iron
rule.

And if the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy had used his
shameless demagoguery to expose suspected Hitler
sympathizers, instead of Stalin's covert admirers, he would
have been hailed as an all-American hero. Yet since the end of
the Cold War, KGB files show that McCarthy exposed a
veritable communist conspiracy to undermine and co-opt the
U.S. government.

No one symbolizes the brutality of military rule in Latin
America from the 1960s to the 1980s more than Gen.
Pinochet, we are told by the dominant media culture. The
success of his coup, they say, and the ensuing terror helped
deepen conflicts in South and Central America by inspiring
generals to believe they could resist democratic reform.
Orwellian newspeak and Soviet-style disinformation have been
resuscitated. Anti-anti-communism remains in fashion.

What has Fidel Castro been doing since 1959? Running a
political charm school and minding his own business -- or
practicing state terror and trying to foment revolution
throughout South and Central America from the 1960s to the
1980s? Were the Contras resisting democratic reform in
Nicaragua --or fighting the puppet Marxist regime of a Soviet
satellite in the Caribbean?

Since institutional memories --as opposed to the selective
pre-programmed kind -- are as rare as snowflakes in the
Sahara, it might be useful to recall what the "democratically
elected government" of Salvatore Allende (with 36 percent of
the vote) inflicted on Chile before Gen. Pinochet decided to roll
out the tanks. Gen. Pinochet did not suddenly decide the
communists had to go. In fact, generals had participated in
three of Allende's Cabinets and reluctantly agreed to act when
they had proof positive of what the communists had in store for
Chile. Communist agents were inciting rebellion inside the
armed forces, which had been the proverbial straw that broke
the dromedary's back in Brazil in 1964 and Indonesia in 1965.

A Bolshevik-type insurrection was in the works. Some
14,000 foreign agitators had moved into Chile with a wink and
a nod from Allende. They ranged from Cuban DGI agents,
who were in charge of reorganizing Allende's security services,
to Soviet, Czech and North Korean military instructors and
arms suppliers, to hard-line Spanish and Portuguese
Communist Party members. They were organizing
revolutionary brigades to take on the Chilean army.

Regis Debray, a prominent French armchair revolutionary,
friend of Mr. Castro and Che Guevara, saw Allende one
month before Gen. Pinochet's 1973 coup. He wrote in
France's leftist Nouvel Observateur: "We all knew that it was
merely a tactical matter of winning time to organize, to arrange,
and to coordinate the military formations of the parties that
made up the Popular Unity government. It was a race against
the clock."

And Gen. Pinochet won the race. A frustrated left has
demonized him ever since -- and young journalists who know
nothing about the period have parroted liberal distortions of
history.

Shortly before Gen. Pinochet's coup, the Chilean Supreme
Court and parliament ruled that Allende's government had
repeatedly violated the constitution. Allende was a lifelong
Marxist who had espoused Trotskyism in his youth. The
lily-red revolutionaries saw him as a transition figure -- some
saw him as another Kerensky -- to a full-fledged communist
regime a la Cuba. His daughter Beatrice, known as Tati, was
married to Luis de Ona, the Cuban DGI agent responsible for
coordinating Che Guevara's ill-fated expedition to Bolivia.
Chile's communists prior to Allende's election in 1970 were
hardly benign. They were the first outside the Warsaw Pact
nations to applaud the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in
1968.

Gen. Pinochet's exactions did not take place in a vacuum. It
was a life-and-death struggle throughout most of Latin
America. Tupamaros and other urban terrorists and rural
guerrillas were on the move from Montevideo to Managua.
Gen. Pinochet fought fire with fire.

To head off the civil war the revolutionaries would have
triggered if the plan outlined by Regis Debray had succeeded,
Gen. Pinochet ordered the arrest of thousands. Many were
tortured and killed, including foreign agitators. The deplorable
excesses of Gen. Pinochet's rule averted a civil war that would
have been a lot worse. One million were killed in the Spanish
Civil War (1936-39), and Francisco Franco was reviled for
much the same reasons as Gen. Pinochet: He defeated the
communists. KGB documents have now revealed that there
was indeed a Stalinist attempt to take over Spain in the guise of
a helping hand for the Spanish Republicans fighting Franco and
his Nazi and fascist allies.

Both Franco and Gen. Pinochet went on to rebuild their
ravaged economies and laid the foundations for a prosperous
economy, the cornerstone for the solid, viable and enduring
democracy that followed. A Third World basket case under
Allende, Chile became an economic miracle under Gen.
Pinochet.

Interestingly enough, Augusto Pinochet is hated by liberal
establishments the world over for the same reason he is lionized
in today's impoverished Russia.

On a recent visit to the United States, Russia's ousted
liberal reformer Boris Nemtsov startled his American friends
and admirers when he said Gen. Pinochet is the only foreign
hero in post-communist Russia. Asked why, Mr. Nemtsov
replied, "Because he threw out a communist regime, admittedly
killing a few hundred people along the way, and established the
foundations for genuine political democracy and a thriving
market economy."

Which is what all Russians long for, and
which Castro-backed Allende had destroyed in Chile.

Liberals accuse the CIA of meddling in Chile and helping
Gen. Pinochet's anti-Allende coup. The coup itself took the
CIA by surprise, but it was certainly involved against Allende.

As it was in Italy in 1948 with lavish covert funding to prevent
what otherwise would have been a "democratically elected"
then Stalinist Communist Party taking over Italy.
Europe's Marxists and leftist intelligentsia and what Stalin
once called "useful idiots" were hoping Allende's Chilean
experiment would lead to similar ballot box communist
victories.
washtimes.com



To: lazarre who wrote (10784)10/28/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 67261
 
>>Let Zolt! have his flights of fancy. He is harmless to most folks equipped with the facts

And that obviously includes you OUT.

>>---its the others I worry about.

So that is you on the cover of Mad Magazine!

From the web site of José Piñera www.pensionreform.org/.

Letter from the Editor No 11

Pinochet: The Historic Truth

October 21, 1998

The worst of all the condemnations made of ex President Pinochet is that of having brought down Salvador Allende's "democratic government". Here we have a monumental historic falsehood.

It is true that Salvador Allende was elected in 1970 by means of a democratic election, although only with 36.6% of the vote. Nevertheless, it is equally true that his government lost its democratic character by having repeatedly violated the Constitution.

In effect, President Allende became a tyrant when he broke his solemn oath to respect the Constitution and the Chilean laws. This was not just obvious to the great majority of Chileans in their daily lives, but was also established by almost two thirds of the House of Deputies (the Lower House of the Chilean Congress) in its momentous Agreement of 23 August 1973 (there was also a statement to the same effect from the Supreme Court).

In this Agreement, it is presented a list of the legal and constitutional violations of President Allende's government and it is agreed to "make representations" of this "grave breach of the legal and constitutional order of the Republic" to, among other authorities, "the Armed Forces". At the same time it agrees to "make representations to them that, by virtue of their function, of their oath to remaim faithful to the Constitution and the law, ... it is up to them to put immediate end to all the situations referred to above, which infringe the Constitution and the law".

Since no feasible mechanism existed in the Chilean Constitution to remove a President who had lost his democratic nature, the House of Deputies, with the support of all the representatives of then Christian Democratic Party, "made representations" to the Armed Forces that "it was up to them to put immediate end" to this grave situation. This was, in fact, an inequivocal call to remove President Allende.

The Armed Forces, led by the person who was then the Commander in Chief of the Army, General Augusto Pinochet, complied with the Agreemend of the House of Deputies eighteen days later, on 11 September 1973.

Therefore the origins of the military government were as "democratic" as it was possible in a revolutionary process in which only the use of force was left in order to remove a tyrant. And, as Benjamin Franklin, one of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence of the United States, once said, "rebellion against a tyrant is obedience to God".

When a President elected by a third of the population is removed, and especially if his government has fomented the creation of armed militias, it is inevitable that a state of "civil war" should ensue. In some countries conflicts of this nature have produced hundreds of thousands of victims. For example, the Spanish civil war brought one million deaths. Even the United States civil war, also the product of a Constitution which was not clear concerning whether the right for a state to opt out of the Union existed or not, resulted, more than a century ago now, in 650,000 deaths (more than the total of the fallen in all U.S. wars of the 20th century).

Lamenting each one of the victims, Chileans and foreigners, who fell in Chile, and condemning each one of the abuses which both sides committed in the embryonic civil war which lasted for years, it is important to point out that the Chilean revolution produced a minimal number of deaths when compared to any historic standard. Even the Report of the Commission which President Aylwin's government, antagonistic to President Pinochet's, set up (the so-called "Rettig Report"), concluded that in the 17 year period around 2,000 people died.

Of course, there were some unnecessary and unjust restrictions on individual rights during President Pinochet's government. I denounced them, not without receiving personal attacks in a country in which reigned the unconditionality of some and the fanaticism of others, in this very publication on many occasions (see www.economiaysociedad.com the article "What Jose
Piñera said about democracy and human rights during the military government?"). For which reason, I can affirm with the same independence that, although some policies of the government,
such as exile, were unjust and unnecessary, the deaths out of combat and the disappearances still not cleared up today were excesses of the intelligence services in their fight against terrorism and those whom they considered the terrorists' allies.

The guilty should have the full rigour of the relevant laws applied to them, and that is exactly why, at this present time, the General who was head of the DINA (National Intelligence Service) when these violations were committed is in prison serving a seven year sentence. But to try to blame some of these specific acts on ex President Pinochet is absolutely unjustified and, therefore, his arrest in London has not only trampled underfoot that priciple of diplomatic immunity, but also constitutes a grave breach of his human rights.

In addition to the successful economic transformation carried out by his government, the momentous achievement which meant avoiding a war with Argentina, and the voluntary transition to a democratic government, the historical truth demands recognition that Presidente Pinochet led a legitimate rebellion against tyranny and that during his government the price was a minimal cost in human lives, the majority the result of the quasi civil war.

If there is a document which should be read at this point in time, it is the historical Agreement of the House of Deputies of 23 August 1973. I have called it the "Declaration of the Breakdown of Chile's Democracy". pensionreform.org
I ask you to circulate it widely, especially among the young, so that the attempts to falsify history do not triumph.

By so iniciating a campaign to reestablish the historic truth about this key moment in Chile's history, we will not only be serving our country, but also helping the ex President whose government saved Chile, and who today lies, at the age of 82, in his sick bed, kidnapped illegally and cowardly by the neo-socialist British government.

José Piñera



To: lazarre who wrote (10784)10/28/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Toronto Sun
October 28, 1998 Eric Margolis

PINOCHET IS A HERO

NEW YORK - Chile's former strongman, Gen. Augusto Pinochet, is the Great Satan for leftists everywhere.

This week, Pinochet, now a Chilean senator, was arrested in London, where he had gone for back surgery. Britain held the 82-year old retired general after a Spanish judge sought to have Pinochet extradited to Spain to face charges of 'genocide, torture, and other crimes' rising from the disappearance of Spanish marxists during Chile's 'dirty war' of the 1970's.

Ironically, Cuba's communist caudillo, Fidel Castro, whose firing squads
have executed thousands, and whose prisons are notorious for vicious
torture of political prisoners, was being fêted in Spain at the very same time
the warrant was issued for Pinochet.

Communists and their little step-sisters, socialists, are making a great hue
and cry that Chilean security forces killed 2,000-3,000 marxists during the
70's dirty war. This sudden and touching concern for human rights comes
from a party that murdered 80 MILLION people this century and has never
even repented its monstrous crimes.

Had Allende's communist cemented their hold on Chile, thousands of
'bourgeois' and 'enemies of the people' would have been executed - as they
were in Cuba.

Britain is holding Senator Pinochet in violation of the diplomatic passport he
carries. Tony Blair's new socialist government is obviously more concerned
with ideological revenge than diplomatic convention. And talk about
'perfidious Albion.' During the Falklands War, Gen. Pinochet aided Britain,
and saved many British lives, even allowing Britain's SAS commandos to
operate against Argentina from Chile. So much for British gratitude.

Beside the shocking illegality of his detention by Britain, the charges
levelled against Pinochet by the Spanish judge and the left-leaning media
are untrue - or distorted.

In 1973, army commander Pinochet overthrew Marxist Salvador Allende,
who was turning Chile onto a Stalinist state. Pinochet, backed by the US and
Britain, led the subsequent war against marxist terrorists. All urban wars are
dirty and bloody. Look at Northern Ireland, Israel's war against Palestinians,
or Algeria.

Marxist urban rebels tried to overthrow Chile's government, using
bombings, assassinations, kidnapping and guerrilla assaults. Chile, and
neighboring Argentina, suffered a reign of terror and faced near anarchy as
communist guerillas attempted, in their own words, to 'destroy the capitalist
state.'

Chilean and Argentine security forces were ordered to fight an all-out war
against the communist rebels. Terror against terror. In the process, some
innocent people were arrested, tortured or disappeared. But most victims
were not innocents. They were mainly marxist guerillas and terrorists, or
part of the marxist support network, that included students, and marxist
clergy and nuns.

The soldiers finally won these bloody wars, restoring peace to Chile and
Argentina. Today, thanks to - and because of - victory in these conflicts,
Chile and Argentina are proud, prosperous democracies. The soldiers who
did the necessary dirty work to make this possible are often accused of
crimes, and shunned by society they saved.

Pinochet's sweeping free market reforms transformed Chile from a socialist
disaster into Latin America's fastest growing economy. Once Chile was
politically stable and economically booming, Pinochet returned Chile to full
democracy. He resigned from the military and became a senator.

The charges against Pinochet are preposterous. The Spanish judge has no
grounds to demand arrest. Genocide deals with eradication of whole
peoples, not a few thousand marxist revolutionaries in an urban terror war.
Russia just murdered 100,000 Chechens. Serbs killed 300,000 civilians in
Bosnia and Kosova. Where are the warrants for ex-communist Yeltsin and
current communists Milosevic? Or Castro?

Final irony. If Pinochet had failed and Allende survived, Chile would not be a
democracy today, but a Stalinist police state like Cuba, with no human
rights, no democracy, and thousands of political prisoners.

Pinochet's triumphant success in Chile reminds leftists of communism's
great crimes and abject failures. That's why they hate him so much.

Pinochet saved Chile and restored democracy. He deserves salutes, not
arrest.
canoe.ca



To: lazarre who wrote (10784)10/28/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>>Let Zolt! have his flights of fancy. He is harmless to most folks equipped with the facts---its the others I worry about.

Whoops, the law intrudes on the rule that is Leftist insanity:

Court Rules Pinochet Has Immunity

By SUE LEEMAN Associated Press Writer

LONDON (AP) -- Three High Court judges today quashed
arrest warrants against Gen. Augusto Pinochet, ruling that the
former Chilean dictator is entitled to immunity from
prosecution.

''The applicant is entitled as a former head of state to
immunity from civil and criminal proceedings of the English
court,'' Lord Chief Justice Thomas Bingham said.

Pinochet, 82, will remain in custody pending appeal by a
Spanish magistrate.

Dozens of Chilean exiles in court cheered when they heard
Pinochet must stay in custody.

''A former head of state is clearly entitled to immunity for
criminal acts committed in the course of exercising public
functions,'' Bingham said.

''I order that both provisional warrants be quashed. We will
listen to any argument that will be addressed to us on leave to
appeal.''

British police arrested the 82-year-old Pinochet on Oct. 16 in
his bed at a London hospital. He was arrested on a warrant
from a Spanish magistrate seeking his extradition to face
charges of murder, kidnapping and torturing political
opponents during his 17-year rule.

Four Chilean exiles have asked Britain's Attorney General to
make Pinochet stand trial in Britain. Similar filings are being
pursued in Switzerland, Sweden and France.

Pinochet stepped down in 1990, but remained
commander-in-chief of the army until last March.

Pinochet's lawyers argued that the Spanish warrant was illegal
on grounds that former heads of state cannot be prosecuted
for actions committed in their ''official capacity'' and because
he is not Spanish.

Attorney Alun Jones, representing the Spanish magistrate,
countered that murder and torture are not ''something that is
in the furtherance of his function as head of state.''

Jones alleged that Pinochet was responsible for up to 4,000
murders, including at least one in the United States, and had
sent agents to Spain to kill opponents there.

Pinochet is under guard in a London hospital, where he is
recovering from an Oct. 9 back operation.

Earlier, Britain had advised its citizens to avoid nonessential
travel to Chile, warning they could become targets of violence
there in response to Pinochet's arrest.

The Foreign Office said anti-British feeling is running high in
Chile since Pinochet's arrest.

The travel warning caused some surprise in Chile because
authorities said no crimes targeting British citizens have been

reported. Officials of the Chilean-British Culture Institute in
Santiago confirmed receiving insulting telephone calls, but
refused to comment further.

In its travel advisory, the Foreign Office called the situation in
Chile ''volatile.'' British nationals and British commercial
interests could become ''targets of mob violence,'' it
cautioned, and Britons should ''keep a low profile.''

Chilean Deputy Foreign Minister Mariano Fernandez, in
London seeking Pinochet's release, said the travel warning
was ''not the best way to avoid the political escalation of this
situation.''

It was ''giving the way for the interpretation that you are
facing almost a political conflict. This is not our view,'' he said.

In protest of Pinochet's detention, two Chilean admirals had
called off a trip to negotiate the possible purchase of three
British warships.

In Spain, Judge Baltasar Garzon, who instigated the arrest,
rejected appeals against the warrant made last week by
Eduardo Fungarino, chief prosecutor of the National Court to
which Garzon is also attached.

Garzon has issued a new extradition warrant alleging an
unspecified number of murders, tortures and kidnappings up
to 1992, two years after Pinochet stood down. He remained
commander-in-chief of the Chilean army until March.
newsday.com

That should put a damper on some Halloween parties. Even the Spanish government opposed the gross abuse of power by the magistrate and the British government.

Now maybe the world can concentrate on the remaining tyrants and on coming to terms with the absolutely unprecedented scale of mass murders and human rights violations perpetrated by the Leftist totalitarians of the 20th century.