Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roy F. Baker who wrote (3910)	10/22/1998 7:19:00 PM
From: May Tran	Respond to of 40688

We find bashers, neg. posters, and conservative people all over the SI threads. So what's new? As I had posted long ago, when we are buying a stock, we should consider of the risk and the reward in the stock. And patience is always be the key for investment. Lock your stocks up and let it rises. IRS allows newly created business 3 years of taking loses. PNLK is only 6 months old. We don't make a baby run before s/he can walk, do we? As of now, we don't have any more question about the existing of the business. We know PNLK is not a fraud as I've read back in June. We know this PNLK has partnership with big players in the market and because it is only several month old, do we expect to see it doing so well as others been in the market long time ago? As I recall, other internet companies do report a loss don't they? I bet some of us in here already have a family, even have kids. Remember of the time when you first got your baby? The feeling was so good wasn't it? And if anyone saying neg. thing about your baby, that would offense you, wouldn't it? Me too. As for PNLK, I feel pretty bad when someone saying neg. about it. But I know why I'd decided to put my money in this stock. But for you, Do you know why? Give PNLK sometimes, people. So, if you are a long term investor, you have nothing to worry about. If you are a short term investor or a day trader, find some other stock which is more volative in its movement. PNLK is doing fine the way it is. Isn't this the way that Jean and Glenn have wanted the stock to be? Otherwise, they would be better to introduce the stock as an IPO with some big broker house. It was a long day at work. sorry if my post got carry away. Happy investing everyone. Johnny P.S. Thanks Allen for posting my post.

To: Roy F. Baker who wrote (3910)	10/22/1998 8:24:00 PM
From: E. M. Edds	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

Thank you for your kind words and support. Something occurred to me in the last hour--something bothered me about my conversation with Mr. Zagoren. My question was, "In my reading, I came across several references that you have committed to releasing a PR regarding the number of subscriptions next week. Is that accurate?" He corrected me in saying, "I said I would have a PR by the end of the month. It will discuss not only subscription numbers, but other ongoing developments . . ." The point I am trying to make is that it is possible he corrected me because there could be a press release tomorrow. That would be before the end of the month but not next week. Otherwise, I cannot think of why he would have corrected my statement. The only reason I bring this up is because it has been bothering me all day since I spoke to him why he would have corrected my original statement. It's a very subtle distinction. If the "excellent news" (in the words of Mr. Zagoren) happens tomorrow or next week, it makes no difference to me. I'm confident we will see a substantial increase in share value either way. Best of luck