Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (39904)	10/22/1998 8:57:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 1574261

Cringe - re: " Note to Paul, I left a few gaps in this message for you to reply to with your typical type of post. " No - YOUR GAPS speak for themselves, Cringe. Paul

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (39904)	10/23/1998 3:01:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1574261

<You must read too deep into my posts because all I posted was facts. I don't see how you get "Intel die" from that, maybe that is what you are thinking, because it sure isn't what I posted. If you read one of my first posts here, you will notice that I stated there is room for both AMD and Intel in the marketplace. I don't know of anyone who would want Intel to die because AMD obviously doesn't the capacity to cater to the whole world.> You misunderstood me. I felt that AMD is pricing their CPU's much lower than they need to. If my feelings are correct, that means that either: 1) AMD is a non-profit organization 2) AMD is trying to kamakaze Intel's ASP's again 3) Demand for AMD CPU's is lower than I thought 4) AMD has teenagers in their marketing department When I made the "alt.intel.die.die.die" comment, I wasn't specifically refering to you. Tenchusatsu