SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (527)10/23/1998 6:08:00 AM
From: Mr Metals  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3282
 
The volume tells me there's some knowledge here.

Didn't you slam ARP when I posted on it a few weeks ago? I believe ARP was 90c then.

Message 5391990
This company is bogus and its reporting is below any acceptable standards

Message 5976838

ROTFLMFAO
Message 5978642

WHO'S THE BEST
Message 6015616

CHECK THIS BOZO OUT

Message 6023210
Dean PS My money is definitely looking for better deals than this!

It just goes to show you all that most (95%) posters don't know jack s**t about what they're talking about except for a few.https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=6027419

It's all BS folks.

Cheers,

Mr Metals






To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (527)10/23/1998 1:39:00 PM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3282
 
Hi Elizabeth. First, let me congratulate you on your prediction of .25c for Donner back in Jun98...it's at .25c now! (see I don't forget predictions)

Comparing the AQP vs ARP based on present known info is not valid. AQP had 32 holes before Barrick jumped in. There was continuity and there was logical reason to suspect large ounces! So as not to get ARP people upset. I am not saying ARP is, or is not, another AQP! For your info Elizabeth I bought into AQP at drill hole 11 and still made a high percentage!

the Chief