Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (10841)	10/22/1998 11:49:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 67261

re Whadya say, Dwight? Am I misrepresenting you to say you have an absolutist position? My "position" is not material to the Congressional legislation of a ban on Partial Birth Abortion. You are wrong in suggesting that "Every time somebody's brought up the "barbarism" of "partial birth abortion", with all the requisite gory descriptions, it's been clear they're not interested in banning partial birth abortions, or reducing the number through better education and birth control. They're interested in banning abortions, period." What the Congressional legislation concerned, Daniel, was *Partial Birth Abortions*. That was the extent of the proposed law, which passed with full bi-partisan support in both houses, requiring only the President's signature. But, since the President had made a pact with the feminazi's, he couldn't sign it: "A BJ for me, a veto for you".