Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George J. Tromp who wrote (1428)	10/23/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: Tomato	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2251

George, I've written IR at WSP 3 times now with no response. Most particularly I'd like to know the reason why the mini-bulk sample valued the kimberlite at US$343/tonne whereas the scoping study used US$260/tonne? Do you have a explanation for the difference? I find it troubling that Sophie (assuming she's still responsible for IR) won't respond to my question (and other questions as well), which I imagine any thinking WSP investor would like the answer to. I'm hopeful and optimistic that WSP stock will climb multiple times from where it's at today, but I'll be very glad when I can get out with a good profit and get into stocks which are more SH friendly. I sure haven't forgotten the option repricing and now they won't even respond to my email requests for information. Pretty bad form, IMHO.