Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : i2 Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MU Lation who wrote (809)	10/23/1998 10:37:00 AM
From: Mohan Marette	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2339

Guidance,Q3 Vs Q4. Q3 guidance quite dismal but performance turned out to be excellent- Q4 guidance was very optimistic as we know and the performance? Ok I will do the math.<g> MU Lation: Listening to Q3 guidance was like listening to Mr.Glum,Q4 guidance on the other hand was like like listening to Mr.Confident (well that is a stretch for Sidhu).Now anybody with a little common sense can put 2 and 2 together and come to their own conclusions. That Pru guys was something else trying hard to come with a 'flat' year scenario for 1999,he tried hard but no cigar. Even the ball park figure of $500 mil in Rev thrown at them is no chump change compared to what the revenue will for 98,even at the reduced 10% margin the end result before taxes can not be flat.No idea where this guy went to school,probably Harvard,eh?