Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hunter Vann who wrote (2578)	10/23/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: John Solder	Respond to of 10072

Make that 4 people. I urge everyone to contact the SEC. They have a new web interface that makes it easy to give them info regarding possible FUDsters. sec.gov They have a section just for Enforcement Division.

To: Hunter Vann who wrote (2578)	10/23/1998 6:26:00 PM
From: Dale Stempson	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 10072

Geez, all this concern about Rocky being a paid poster? - I think the possibility is more remote than a SyQuest buy-out of Iomega. I'd suggest just letting it go. In any case, I don't believe even the most tenacious poster (regardless of his/her position) can have any impact on the price of stock like IOM. (unless of course one were to post forged press releases or the like, which have at times in the past caused short-term trading blips for some stocks). I think it's clear that Rocky has no intention of leaving this or any thread because of comments, made-up rules, suggestions or insults. IMO, he shouldn't have to. I would hope that folks here would either skip his posts or respond and challenge his views on Iomega, but I'm beginning to get bored with wading through continuous discussions about Rocky instead of Iomega. BTW, Congrats to all the shareholders today who were given a little breathing room with today's move up. I hope it continues. Regards - Dale