Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (10954)	10/23/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Reread the post. This time, have an adult help you with the comprehension. You totally and completely missed the point. Or, was that intentional?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (10954)	10/23/1998 7:19:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

<<Do you really believe a straight person would choose to become gay just because it was fashionable?>> I can't imagine it for myself. I don't have a problem hanging around gays at work or leisure. I don't find anything uncomfortable or offensive in my interactions with gays. I have a question though. Two and two isn't adding up here. Some times I get a comment like that from people like you and it seems to be directed at putting me on the defensive. Other times when you are reporting on how backward and close minded this culture is you report on how cultures such as the Greek Empire developed to the point of Homosexuality being the the standard and preference among mainstream men. So, which is it, with education, understanding, acceptance and a different level of inculturation we will establish a different way of being together. Or, this is it, and their is no movement issue. We the non-gay just need to let-it-be for the gays.

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (10954)	10/23/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Or, are you just trying to be every where at once with no clear position that would alienate your magazine subscribers. The politically correct stance has been a loser for several years now. But good luck anyway.

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (10954)	10/23/1998 7:26:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Borzou - it isn't the self-actualized heterosexual that is at risk; it is instead, the individual with gaps in their emotional makeup that are easily influenced toward experimentation with immoral behaviors. The majority of these are children, and in order for the homosexual community to even exist, they must be recruited into exploring perversion with another person who has abandoned normal sexual mores and is willing to draw someone into homosexuality. It has nothing to do with communism; the fact that the left is the water-carrier for the homosexuals means that the left is not only condoning the perversion, it must promote it. Otherwise, homosexuality would dwindle back into obscurity. Mr. K.