SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spots who wrote (3212)10/24/1998 9:02:00 AM
From: Sean W. Smith  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 14778
 
>>All of the chips are locked to their respective clock
multiplier (ie 300a = 4.5x 266 = 4.0x 333=5.0x etc.) but are not
locked in to any one frequency or bus speed.


This would be easy to do. You just put two extra foot prints on the PCB for the Slot 1 Card and populate the approriate resistors to acheive the desired clock multiplier. quick and dirty. If you wanted it to be more tamper proof you just laser etch the die after speed grading. Also very easy not expensive to do....

Exactly the way I understood it myself. How is the poor
little chip going to know that its head is getting played
with by the clock signal?

Actually you could put some circuitry on board or on chip to measure that and halt if it was clocked wrong. I've seen this done on military designs. not very far out at all....

An onboard crystal or something?
(Talk about expensive!)
Thanks for confirming my suspicions. I'm not an EE, but that
didn't seem reasonable, practically speaking


Actually small surface mount oscillators in a the industry standard "Tiny T" Package are extrememly small and extremely cheap.

viteonline.com

These things are very cheap in the volumes we use and would be very very cheap in the volumes that someone like intel uses on their processors. Bottomline, its both simple and cost effect and don't be too surprised to see it happen in the future.

Sean