Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (11040)	10/24/1998 1:10:00 PM
From: Volsi Mimir	Respond to of 67261

I tend to go along with the former (making me pro-choice) because, once again, women will seek abortions whether they're illegal or not. That is my dilemma.Wish I had read this post before I posted to Mr.Pilch...I would of linked to this. Somehow no one wins. Well said Borzou eddyb

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (11040)	10/24/1998 2:49:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

<<I tend to go along with the former (making me pro-choice) because, once again, women will seek abortions whether they're illegal or not.>> If I understand the basis of your logic you are a supporter only because people will do it whether it's legal or not. Since you are a liberally fair person then, do you support anything that people are going to do whether its legal or not? If you do draw a line, would you mind terribly giving me a hint where it would lie. I am not being sarcastic here. All of your posts on this and other issues have indicated how accepting, and tolerant you are. I'm just wondering if you are able to define a limit on what you accept.