To: Drake who wrote (8912 ) 10/24/1998 12:39:00 PM From: MileHigh Respond to of 93625
Obviously, since I am a shareholder, I would disagree with this man's opinion....After all, will the intel investment drive prices higher and take the technology away form other DRAM manu's and OEM's? ABSOLUTELY NOT! It will make the technology widely available, cheaper and abundant.....Now if Intel bought RMBS, that could raise some eyebrows......Read on... MileHigh Search Home Advanced Search Search Help Web Search October 26, 1998, Issue: 1032 Section: Opinion/Letters -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wake up, FTC Rick Boyd-Merritt The irony was rich indeed when Intel Corp. announced it was making a $500 million investment in Micron Technology just days before the Department of Justice's antitrust trial against Microsoft Corp. was scheduled to begin. If Washington ever needed an example of a dominant company in the PC industry trying to use its clout to direct the future of markets outside its domain, the Intel/Micron investment is it. Micron has positioned itself as a leading supplier of alternative high-performance memories, including double-data-rate DRAMs and Synclink DRAMs. But Intel is staking its PC and microprocessor road maps next year to the rise of Direct Rambus DRAMs, and struck a deal to invest the $500 million in Micron with the understanding that the money-Intel's largest single investment in an outside company-would be used to fund a Rambus push. Micron claims it will continue to differentiate itself by offering alternatives to Rambus, but I have to wonder about the depth of its commitment given such a large investment from Intel. For its part, Intel claimed it was trying to ensure a robust supply of the relatively complex Rambus parts at a time when ailing memory makers in Asia are loath to invest in new technologies, but again I find it hard to believe. Intel would not gain directly from any sales of Rambus parts. But it stands to lose in a big way if there is not an adequate supply of Rambus parts for the motherboards, processors and chip sets it hopes to ship next year-or if PC makers spend a significant amount of their time in 1999 building designs around any alternatives to the vision Intel has articulated. I suspect it will become increasingly difficult for PC engineers to make a case for building systems with non-Intel parts following this deal. Ironically, Micron's PC division had considered designing its own core logic for at least two projects, but the last I heard the company couldn't get a license to the Intel Pentium II processor bus that would enable such silicon. If the Federal Trade Commission waits as long to review the Intel/Micron deal as the Department of Justice did to address Microsoft's tactics with an integrated browser, the whole matter will be reduced to an historical case study of a once more-diverse DRAM industry. Hello, Washington, is anyone listening? Copyright ® 1998 CMP Media Inc.