SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (67312)10/24/1998 8:45:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria,

Not long ago, many EDA vendors and analysts viewed Windows NT as the next
platform of choice for EDA software. But the chip designers who control the
vast majority of the EDA industry's revenues had other ideas, and it's recently
become apparent that the Windows NT juggernaut has slowed.


That's the best article I've seen about platforms for EDA design, thanks.

He didn't say NT wasn't still a juggernaut, though did he? It's just a slowing juggernaut. From the article:

The most visible chip-design companies that are moving
from Unix to Windows NT are Compaq and Intel...


Well, does anyone else really count? (I mean Intel). Compaq? is that DEC alpha design?

Well, this is real progress for NT (Synopsis and Cadence are THE EDA companies, right?):

EDA vendors, meanwhile, are moving more and more
applications to Windows NT, although most IC
physical-design applications are still Unix-based. With key
applications such as Synopsys' Design Compiler and
Cadence's Verilog-XL now available on NT, enough
critical mass is there for customers to start making the
move.


And, this is good, and should be robust on top of robust:

Murray is interested in low-cost hardware, but what he'd
really like to see is Solaris running on a Merced platform.


IMO, NT is getting better all the time and, don't forget, UNIX hasn't been trusted for mission critical applications for all time either.

Tony