SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (34502)10/25/1998 11:42:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Coby, I've been known to make money doing this options stuff. <G>

Actually, it probably isn't as complicated as I make it sound. I made my fortune, such as it is, by inventing, developing, ripping off from others and managing/trading low risk/moderate to high return option strategies for institutions. Sometimes they were tax flim-flam, sometimes they were capital gains intensive and most often they were maximum income generators. I have pretty much walked the waterfront in this area and have only fallen off the pier a few hundred times. <G>

Don't feel bad if you don't get it immediately. Sometimes I have to sit down and say "I'm doing what?!!!!" <G> And I've been an options geek for 30 years. But when I look at my peers on the income side taking on brain dead mortgage derivatives to get an extra hundred basis points over the long bond, while my strategies are lower risk and give me 1000 extra basis points over the long bond, I have to say these headaches and the gray hair are worth it. And I still believe my 90/10 strategy, most of which I ripped off from mentors and even people who didn't like me, is the best generator of capital gains at super low risk, in the world.

I just wish I didn't spend all the profits I make. Hmmmm, maybe that Paul Krugman guy has a point about demand. <VBG>

MB

MB



To: Ilaine who wrote (34502)10/25/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: KENNETH R SANDERS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
CB>>>>>>>>>>> If so, I will go back and
read all 30,000 posts in the thread, because it sounds like SERIOUS mojo.<<<<<<<<<<<<< Skip all the ones signed " steve" or" hpeace ". That will eliminate about 15,000 posts(unless you want to hear about CPQ when it was a good stock)<G>