Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave who wrote (17141)	10/25/1998 5:05:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

To Dave: When you suggest any argument that the Q could use effectively, your objectivity will be clear. :-) Chaz

To: Dave who wrote (17141)	10/25/1998 8:38:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

When certain entities (either people or corporations) consistently tell exactly the truth (and no Bill or Hillary Clinton "weasel" stuff), then you tend to develop trust, and maybe even admiration for their integrity. When others do the reverse, I rapidly reach a point where I just assume everything they say is a misrepresentation of the truth; and I have no interest in what they say. I have often said "The world would need a lot fewer lawyers if only there were not people like X and corporations like Y." Ericsson (based on my limited knowledge) has established themselves as sleazeballs, and I am eager for them to be crushed in court. I am irritated that you spend any meaningful amount of time assuming that ERICY's position on things is legitimate. We already know what kind of a company they are. It is just a question of how quickly their actions will come back to hurt their business. Jon.