Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 2000 - 1 Money under matress or in the computer systems? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Caroline who wrote (4)	10/26/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: Fred Ragan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6

Caroline, My best guess is that the immediate result of a calamitous bank run would be a short period of steep deflation. Cash would indeed be in short supply but people are creatures of habit. They are familiar with values in dollar terms and have virtually no experience with barter. The first preference will be to trade in dollars as they are readily exchanged for the next commodity in demand. The shortage of "cash" dollars will make there relative value in goods rise dramatically. What about the money still in the bank? The under- standing of its value and the value that people will be willing to give it will be affected by the same concerns that caused the bank runs in the first place. If people do not know or believe that they can physically possess their money then the value of that money to them is diminished and will show as a gaping disparity between the buying power of money in the bank (cheques or wire transfers) and cash. A parallel barter economy will quickly develop but at first it will be a secondary economy. The transfer of value by barter is an awkward and clumsy process at best, that will take time to learn especially by people who have no tradition or experience with it, but as we shall see, it will over time become the primary economy. I expect the deflation phase to be brief, maybe two to three months, followed by a long period of rapidly rising inflation as the government tries to head off the barter economy and pay its employees by printing larger and larger amounts of currency. We have as guides the experience of both the Weimar Republic in Germany and the Bolshevik Government in Russia. In each instance over a period of about three years the mark and the ruble devalued to less than one one millionth of their previous buying power. As there is a physical restraint on the printing capacity of even "secure" paper money the quality of the issue will depreciate and the government will quickly have competitors in the printing process. Every functioning photocopier will become a "money machine". If this comes to pass, monetary security will only be available in incorruptible precious metals and barter will be the rule of the day. This is a vary unpleasant and unpromising picture I paint, but if the governments of the world don't begin in earnest to create real credibility in their ability to deal with the issues presented by the Year 2000 problem, people will do as they have always done, that is to look after their own perceived needs first and as best they can. I leave you with this thought; Government can only function so long as the people believe it can solve their problems. The moment that belief dies, the authority of government dies with it.