Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bajasurfer who wrote (8676)	10/25/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: REW	Respond to of 44908

Robert, Granted TSIG may need a cash infusion to accomplish their goals in the immediate future. We have been told the PP is there. My view is RG does not want to complete the PP deal right now. I think he is waiting to take some positive news to the table to get better terms or/and a better stock value due to the positive revues given for the completion of forward business. There are a number of items on the table that will accomplish this goal. TSIG is working very diligently toward improving shareholder value. I think the rewards are just around the corner. Bob

To: Bajasurfer who wrote (8676)	10/25/1998 10:47:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Respond to of 44908

looks like they gave me 2 messages for the price of 1. See the next message. Rich

To: Bajasurfer who wrote (8676)	10/25/1998 10:48:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Respond to of 44908

Robert, There is much to be said in agreement with your points. However, your post has me curious. How *long* have you been in TSIG? Do you see anything that you like at TSIG, and what might that be if your answer is yes? Additionally, your comment They have a negative amortization of 31 MILLION!!! What's your point? Aside from the self-evident how do you view this as bad? Do you believe it would be better as debt? There can be significant tax advantages. After all, we are all aware of the 53,000,000 shares that are issued. Please clarify your point. Rich