SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (40087)10/25/1998 11:40:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1573824
 
Hutch - Re: " Now factor in Intel's cost of production for Celery 333 at $70 vs K6-2 at $35 and you can see that Intel would really be raking it in "

These numbers are totally wrong.

Or at least BACKWARDS !

Remember, Hutch - AMD - $1,000,000 profits

Intel - $1,559,000,000 profits.

Paul



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (40087)10/25/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573824
 
Hutch - Re: "PS Your posts tell me that your are still the same old deceptive Intel investor you have always been but are now trying to hide behind the cloak of a supposed AMD investor . "

I AM an AMD investor and I HAVE BEEN one before.

I'm making mmoney now and I made mone before, as well !

By the way, Hutch - have you or any other " AMD investors" received your settlement papers for the Class Action:

EDWARD McDAID,et.al, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

vs.

Walter J Sanders III, et. al., DEFENDANTS ?

Looks like a little money is going to be repaid to investors who were shafted by AMD - AGAIN !

Paul



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (40087)10/25/1998 11:49:00 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573824
 
Brian,

Re: "Intel's cost of production for Celery 333 at $70 vs K6-2 at $35 ..."

Brian, you have your AMD issued "blinkers" on again ... Remember, Intel
is the low cost producer of CPU's. Intel has the best yield and highest
volume ... This is why Intel has the lowest costs (Treat this confidential
information very carefully). Haven't you "swindled" enough people on
this thread with your AMD HYPE ... I guess you can't see this through
your own "greed".

Make It So,
Yousef



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (40087)10/25/1998 11:55:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1573824
 
Hutch - Re: "AMD's VP Sales comment about attacking Intel at
the high end and notebook CPUs this quarter sound good what do you think as an AMD? investor . "

Didn't Sanders and Raza also predict, after only Compaq introduced a 300 MHz K6 (not a K6-2), that another MAJOR OEM commitment was IMMINENT ?

Well, Hutch, more than a month has gone by - where's that announcement?

Paul
{=========================}
techweb.com

September 28, 1998, Issue: 809
Section: News

AMD targets mobile computers with new K6 chip
Marcia Savage

Sunnyvale, Calif. -- Advanced Micro Devices Inc. last week launched a new
K6 processor for mobile computers that company executives said will
accelerate movement toward low-priced portables.

The 300MHz chip offers high performance but at a competitive price, said
David Somo, a director of product marketing at the Sunnyvale-based company.
The processor is available now for $229 in lots of 1,000. Earlier this month, Intel
Corp., Santa Clara, Calif., unveiled its top-speed portable processor, the
300MHz mobile Pentium II. It starts at $637.

Customers can expect to see the 300MHz K6 in portables that sell for $2,000 to
$2,500. But notebook prices are following the same downward trend as desktop
PC prices, Somo said. "I expect we'll see sub-$1,500 notebooks," he said.

The 300MHz mobile K6 builds on the success of the 266MHz K6 for mobile
computers, according to AMD. The chip maker plans to offer a full line of
mobile processors from entry level to high end, said S. Atiq Raza, AMD's
executive vice president and chief technical officer.

The mobile 300MHz K6 processor generates less heat and consumes less
power than its desktop counterpart, Somo said. It has an extended Tcase rating
of 85 degrees Celsius and typical power consumption of less than 6.6 watts.
The chip is available in PGA and BGA packages. BGA packaging offers the
smallest form factor.

Compaq Computer Corp., Houston, last week introduced the Presario 1250, the
first notebook to feature the new mobile K6 processor. The notebook features
512 Kbytes of Level 2 pipeline burst cache, 64-Mbyte SyncDRAM memory and
a 6.4-Gbyte hard drive. The notebook sells for $2,499 and comes with a $100
mail-in rebate.

AMD executives said they expect other OEMs soon will unveil notebook computers with its new mobile chip, but they declined to provide specifics.

AMD plans to expand its notebook offerings early next year, when it offers a
mobile version of the K6-2 that features AMD's 3DNow technology and a
100MHz bus. The company plans to follow up with a chip targeted for the
performance mobile market. That processor, code-named Sharptooth, is
expected in the first half of 1999.

Intel, meanwhile, plans to release its Celeron processor for low-cost notebooks
early next year. The company also plans to launch the 300MHz Pentium chip
with MMX for mobile computers in the first half of 1999. That product also will
compete in the value notebook market, an Intel spokesman said.

The 300MHz mobile K6 processor performs well, said Nathan Brookwood, an
analyst at San Jose, Calif.-based Dataquest. AMD has a "very viable plan" for
the mobile market, he said. The company will have a slight timing advantage
over Intel in design aspects because AMD already will have a chip out that
offers 3-D when Intel releases its mobile Celeron processor, Brookwood added.

"It continues to be a ball game, and that's what makes it interesting," he said.
"We're seeing a revival of serious product-style competition in these various
markets, and it benefits everybody."