Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CAVALRY'S SHORT BUSTERS - MAGIC EIGHTBALLS PICKS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cavalry who wrote (1354)	10/26/1998 11:27:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1637

do you have any proof that touch of nature is stevia or was my post accurate when i said i had proof ton wasnt stevia, post your proof that i was wrong Ask Jeff. If you're nice, maybe he'll tell you about it. Have some people seen proof of this? Yes. Meanwhile, what you said what that you'd had ToN analyzed, but for mysterious reasons couldn't publish the results you'd paid for. What rubbish. post proof dr petitt never advised aznt you cant, secretaries dont count and you promised to follow up when dr petitt returned please post the followup proof you promised, you cant I beg your pardon? Secretaries don't count, sez the Mighty King Cav? Please read this carefully: said secretary ASKED Pettit for an answer. He gave it to her. Subject: Amazon Natural Treasures Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:00:17 -0700 From: Georgia Reimus <bpettit@asu.edu> Organization: Cancer Research Institute, ASU To: janice@planet.it Dear Ms. Shell: Just a note to let you know that I have been in contact with Dr. Pettit and to let you know that Dr. Pettit has no knowledge of and is not affiliated with Amazon Natural Treasures. Georgia Reimus Secretary to Dr. Pettit If this doesn't satisfy you, tough. I don't doubt it convinced everyone else who read it. one of the three in racg sec filings is gates personal fortune Wrong. Dominion is, as I later said, a venture capital/investment banking outfit. The "fund" to which the article refers is undoubtedly a Gates family trust. Please note that you're the only person on your own thread who believes the Gates/RACG nonsense. Oh yes, and I had an interesting PM sent me by someone knowledgeable in these things; he was laughing his head off. Next thing I know you'll once again be trying to convince me that I'm a broker living in Georgia. Or that I actually reside at the headquarters of a local bank, as you also attempted to do. Mr DD you ain't.