SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: donkeyman who wrote (1475)10/26/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: bill  Respond to of 2251
 
You can mail the diamonds outin a package. A lotof diamonds are
transportd thatway. That's not the cost. The cost will be in
the importing of equipment and personnel, the housing and feeding
of personnel,transportation during the exploration period.If a
pipe is found and a mine created the costs will continue to be
large because there are no local supplies of any hard or soft
materials. If the pipe were rich enough, then it would still be
economic. However, what will be interesting will be seeing what
the cut off per ton is before a mine can be economic in this
region. If a tonne of ore is worth 100 dollars and it costs 100.01
to mine it, you've got rock. There are a lot mineral deposits
around that aresimply not mineable because of cost. I'm not saying
that is the case for Greenland but if the cost of mining a pipe
in Alberta is such that low gradewill sustain a mine, the cost
of mining a pipe in NWT is such that the same grade would not
sustain a mine, then the cost in Greenland would dictate that a
higher grade is necessary. Is there anyone reading this thread who
could give us an idea of the escalating cost and,therefore,grade
necessary for a mine of equal sizeto be viable in Alberta,NWT, Greenland? We'd then know whatto look for in drill results for
the three areas. I'm assuming that cost, if not politics, would
dictate a processing plant in Greeland.