SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bon Scott who wrote (17190)10/26/1998 2:40:00 PM
From: bananawind  Respond to of 152472
 
All... from 10/26 RCR ...

October 26, 1998

Office of U.S. trade details 3G principles

By Lynnette Luna

The United States has spelled out its policy toward third-generation
technology.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has said it supports
principles outlined by the Inter-American Telecommunication Commission
(CITEL), a consensus-led organization that represents telecommunications
industry and government authorities from the 35 members of the
Organization of American States.

On Sept. 18, the permanent Consultative Committee in CITEL
responsible for Radio issues (PCC-III) endorsed principles relating to
International Mobile Telecommunications-2000. The Clinton
administration said the resolution is intended to guide CITEL member
states in their participation in the IMT-2000 process.

The U.S government and CITEL believe the principles outlined should be
taken into account as input to the International Telecommunication
Union's Task Group 8/1 for developing ITU recommendations for
IMT-2000:

1. The ITU should develop IMT-2000 recommendations in such a way
that they will include consideration of evolution of migration paths for
pre-IMT-2000 systems so the negative impacts on existing customers'
functionality and service providers' investment are mitigated.

2. To the extent possible, IMT-2000 technology and standards should be
developed in a manner that is frequency-band independent.

3. The ITU should give consideration to radio transmission technologies
that facilitate evolution from pre-IMT-2000 mobile communications
systems operating in the Americas and around the globe. Critical
IMT-2000 system characteristics such as security, ease of cell placing,
services provided and performance must also be factors in consideration.

4. IMT-2000 recommendations and standards should include
requirements for interfaces and protocols to facilitate roaming and service
delivery between pre-IMT-2000 mobile (including cellular and personal
communications services) communications and from IMT-2000 networks
that may operate in the Americas and around the globe.

5. The ITU should encourage harmonization and consolidation of radio
transmission technology proposals to the fullest extent possible.

6. The IMT-2000 radio interface(s) should, as far as possible, enable
elements of pre-IMT-2000 infrastructure to be re-used.

7. The potential benefits of software-defined radio technologies are
encouraging and should be thoroughly examined as the IMT-2000
recommendations are developed.

Latest Issue



To: Bon Scott who wrote (17190)10/26/1998 2:46:00 PM
From: bananawind  Respond to of 152472
 
All... more on ... PrimeCo goes solo with Lucent

rcrnews.com



To: Bon Scott who wrote (17190)10/26/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: bananawind  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
All... tidbit from Wireless Week site...

Wireless Local Loop
• A new report by Allied Business Intelligence Inc. projects there will be 17,600 base stations in use
for WLL applications at the end of 1998, rising to 714,200 base stations by year-end 2006.

Gee, Raj, these guys must be fools. How can a dog have a compound annual growth rate of 59%?
-Jim



To: Bon Scott who wrote (17190)10/26/1998 5:04:00 PM
From: Dave  Respond to of 152472
 
Bon:

Ericy couldn't rightly charge QCOM 10X over every body else?

Ericsson could charge Qualcomm a higher rate than another company, or ala Qualcomm, refuse to license Qualcomm and license another company. This would be similiar to Qualcomm licensing the Lucent-Phillips venture, or was it Phillips Electronics(?), for CDMA2000, and no one else.

That is entirely up to Ericsson.

dave