To: Just My Opinion who wrote (52799 ) 10/26/1998 2:14:00 PM From: I Am John Galt Respond to of 55532
the stock was up 10% in one week, (do the math, little gas-hopper) and if there are a flurry of buys in any stock,generally speaking, that stock would soar. Boy, is that a ridiculous argument! "Buy this stock! Buy this stock! If everyone listens to me, then the stock will soar! But if you don't, then I will be accused of pumping a stock! Even though this stock has no fundamentals, everyone will listen to me!" Ahhhh... I remember those days at Zulu when I was accused by people on this board (exclusively by people on this board) of pumping a stock. The stock actually did go up! Then that means, by your definition, JMO, that I am vindicated of the label of pumping ZULU. That must also mean, then, by your definition, that I am vindicated of the pumping of RMIL. Because it went up, I am not accused of pumping it. KTWO also went up after I pumped it. That must mean that I am vindicated of that, right? Heh... you defined "pumping" so nonchalantly in your last argument towards me, which makes me wonder if you really have a conception of what "pumping" is.Before you were almost begging me to stop posting to you, on the verge of tears, whinning, on your back like a turtle flailing your limbs, an angry bee in a glass jar, a 4th grader picking it but just can't get it all, a patient in a dental chair, "please don't post to me" wah wah wah!... but in this post I am responding to..that wail, that scream, that wide-eyed plea..is absent. Very well spoken. I look on in awe of your creative prowess. As for the nonposting of the statement to not post to me again, I erred. As an inconsistent human, I am entitled to be inconsistent. Please don't post to me again. Thanks. Please don't post to me again. Thanks. There, I did it twice for consistency's sake!carver.holycross.edu The Evil Dead