SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Egghead Computer (EGGS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fiberman who wrote (3091)10/26/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: James H. Irwin  Respond to of 8307
 
What you are missing is the concept that success begets success(in a relative strength definition ala IBD) in that PM's (Portfolio Managers) go to what's working. Right now EBAY is a concept stock with a lot of momentum behind it. What PM's unfortunately do is sometimes unfortunate but oftentimes gives opportunity to patient retail investors: Example: Say the guy at Janus buys EBAY on the IPO. He enhanced his allocation from his broker by telling that broker he would be good for another 100,000 in the aftermarket (after the stock opens up, oftentimes at a significant premium)...the Janus guy wants the shares, and the broker wants to allocate his largest piece of stock to his largest aftermarket buyers. Now, the Janus guy gets a large infusion of money in his equity fund. He hasn't necessarily found any other solid names (or maybe EGGS is too small for him) and so he tells his trading desk to go buy another 100,000 shares of EBAY and other internet names because he want to enhance his exposure to the internet. The longs squeeze the shorts, the mutual funds, get the MM's short so they jump over one another to cover, break-even, etc. By the way many times MMs get killed in this kind of price action. Do you think any of them thought EBAY was going to be up 20 today...don't think so.

Moral: that's why they call it a feeding frenzy.

bon chance



To: fiberman who wrote (3091)10/26/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: trouthead  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8307
 
This is a good question Mallox Man. I just checked out the earnings statement for both companies. And eBay ain't doing shit. They had 8.9 mil in revenue with $100,000's in earnings. While eggs had 35 mil and a loss of 6.8 mil. Hell we're losing almost as much money as they take in! Maybe that is the problem. We lose money and we don't have the glamour shield that protects amzn.

If Mr Ozone doesn't turn things around here pretty soon I'm going to find out where he lives and take a dump on his lawn. I bet a I could get the Bald one to join me.

jb



To: fiberman who wrote (3091)10/26/1998 7:57:00 PM
From: Kip518  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8307
 
If EBAY is worth in excess of $70, isn't EGGs worth $20? What am I missing here? What does EBAY offer that is so valuable

fman, what EBAY's got that EGGS ain't got is Goldman Sachs. Until EGGS gets institutional/investment banker/broker support (which may be never) it's a putzhead (to use Al d'Amato's term) stock. Kip

(and yes, I'm still long)