Um, Ellen, I'm still looking for it...lessee...
In re: your reference to #reply-6054637
To: Cavalry (1168 )
From: Janice Shell
Saturday, Oct 17 1998 1:56PM ET
Reply # of 1388
Sorry, Cav. I do candles, and what I see is something between a shooting star and an
evening star. Neither bodes well. I also see a stock in continuous downtrend since 25
August. And strong resistance at 1.50, strong support at 1.25.
In other words, minds have not been made up. Short term, if the candles are right, it should
drop once again. Intermediate term, wait and see. As a glance at the MM lineup will show
you, the serious players aren't playing.
Just my take, eh? And it was dead on target, wasn't it? Unlike the prediction offered by Cav the Market Mover. As I also noted, and as you so conveniently forget, I don't normally place a great deal of faith in the reliability of TA where BB stocks are concerned, because they tend to be illiquid. Still, today AZNT broke resistance. What next?
Moving along to #reply-5385598:
To: Patricia C. Trinchero (7526 )
From: Janice Shell
Saturday, Aug 1 1998 7:02PM ET
Reply # of 10855
She would be blown off the stage if she was in a debate with geological engineers.
Oh, please, Pat, find a post in which I've claimed any knowledge of geology or mining. I do
know a bit about how companies are run, though, and a bit more about market mechanics.
Go ahead and look to the "future" of this "company". IMO, though, you'd have done well to
have looked to the past before investing.
As Santayana said: "Those who fail to understand history are condemned to repeat it".
Probably not an exact quote, I'm just terrible with taht stuff. And of course it didn't originate
with S.
I'd be interested to know, though, from your implied perspective as a knowledgeable
geologist or oil and gas person....what IS MTEI's future?
1. They have no money. Be lucky if they can keep going another two months.
2. Assets? The land in West Virginia? Do they have clear title? What's it worth? These are
the questions the SEC is asking.
And this is to reduce the questions to an absolute minimum. Your turn. What is it in this
gruesome picture that does, or should, inspire enthusiasm?
WOW!!! I'd forgotten all about THAT one! Prophetic indeed, wasn't it?
And now (passing over the irrelevant Dave Gore post; and BTW Dave and I have perfectly amicable relations in PMs) we come to #reply-5565405:
To: RBM (765 )
From: Janice Shell
Saturday, Aug 22 1998 6:56PM ET
Reply # of 9408
Actually it doesn't make sense in its own terms. If there were only ten cars left in the world,
there'd also be no mechanics, no gas stations, no gasoline, no spare parts. So what point
would there be in having one?
Not so different with stock. You successfully "freeze" the float, and there won't be any
trading, duh. The MMs will leave, you'll be stuck with an effectively frozen "asset".
Again, I'm sorry. All this is about the stupidest thing I've ever heard. And right here on the
BB threads I've heard a lotta stupid stuff.
And then there's #reply-5568864. Why on earth did you choose this one? Please explain.
To: bgtit (1015 )
From: Janice Shell
Sunday, Aug 23 1998 3:24PM ET
Reply # of 9408
You still don't get the "Silicone" thing, do you, Mr Tit?
So...you think SI should make the Internet Safe for Hypesters? I don't. Give up your
ignorant obsession with "illegal short positions" and take a REAL look at this company.
I've just spent a little time with AZNT's SEC filings. The last 10Q is from May; as we know,
they've requested an extension for the current financials.
Funniest thing, though: I find no reference in these documents to "Zapara", or "Mr Charlies",
or, in fact, to any pending lawsuits at all. Why is this, I wonder? And as ww pointed out
yesterday, it's very odd indeed that the company hasn't filed with regard to its proposed
measures to "enhance shareholder value". If they really mean to do this stuff--and not just
to issue press releases--they have to, you know.
Any comments? I mean interpretive comments, not rants like the one I'm responding to.
Isn't it evident to you that many recent posters to this thread actually KNOW something
about market mechanics and the interpretation of financial statements? Oops, guess not.
Your friend, the (laughing) Demon Behind the Screen
Boy! You really must have spent a lotta time on this. Not to much avail, though. What weird choices: #reply-5835292.
To: Rico Staris (6930 )
From: Janice Shell
Thursday, Sep 24 1998 7:45PM ET
Reply # of 9409
Read the article that I posted about JB Oxford. That is where the "manipulation" came
from.
HUH???? JB Oxford was the clearing firm. What on earth are you talking about? Do you
have an even minimal understanding of market mechanics?
An unexceptionable comment, I'd say. No special "expertise" required.
And finally: #reply-5863207
Here we have the post I addressed:
To: Janice Shell (7280 )
From: Rico Staris
Monday, Sep 28 1998 8:16PM ET
Reply # of 9408
If the TA was trying to "sneak" in 4.480 mil shares, I would definitely FIRE them. With no
hesitation.
Thats the problem with this country, there are people thatyou can pay to look the other
way...even if they know that it is not right.
As far as I know....as far as I am concerned.....The freeze is still on, and the shares were
cancelled.
For the moment we shall leave aside the question of whether any shares were really cancelled, might cause brain fusion. My reply:
To: Rico Staris (7281 )
From: Janice Shell
Monday, Sep 28 1998 8:38PM ET
Reply # of 9409
I'm sorry, but it's late and I can't help myself: this is one of the most idiotic posts I've read
on this thread, and that's SAYING something.
You really don't have a CLUE about the mechanics of this stuff, do you?
Seems normal enough to me.
PLEASE, Ellen, feel FREE to explain to us what you thought you were demonstrating with this collection of posts. Maybe we can help.
|
