Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (11273)	10/26/1998 7:36:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 67261

Excuse me, both those individuals are public people. Appearing on 60 minutes makes you a public person. If you want to remain private, you do not appear on 60 minutes. My exs father turned down an offer to appear on 60 minutes because he valued his privacy and wanted to try to lean back into private life. CEOs and leaders of major corporations are public people. I am not a public person, but if you are going to continue with your catty remarks I think the least you can do is post under your own name and provide us with the URL of your website.

To: Who, me? who wrote (11273)	10/26/1998 7:49:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Who, me? Technically, if I recall at least, the definition of a public person is one who uses, or intends to use, their persona in any form of commercial promotion, entertainment (the arts) or in the political arena. Spouses of politicians are almost always involved in campaigning, so they almost always are fair game, but spouses of "famous" business people are not. I'm not sure what the media-recognized threshold is, but from a slander and libel point of view, I think it hinges on the person's intent to "be" a public figure. In other words, if you own a furniture store or car dealership and you do your own awful, tacky, screaming ads, you are a public person. If you own the store and hire someone to do the awful, tacky screaming ads, you're not. You go on Jerry Springer (assuming you're not a member of the Screen Actors Guild) and you forfeit your claim to being a "private person." If you get yourself involved in charitable events or trade associations and get a few pictures in the paper, you pretty much end up as a public person. On the legal entanglement side, unless you are involved in a matter "of public record," i.e., divorce, lawsuit, criminal charges, etc., you have the right to be left alone and have a fairly clear right to privacy. But once matters like that reach the media, the line starts to stretch, particularly if you respond or seek out publicity. Whether Michelle is a "public person" is beyond my scope - the web is another brave new world. Is a web site "promotion?" It might be. The nuance of not having it listed with any search engine - well, I can't say -- mine is not to be considered a "legal" opinion, either. My recollection is from a family situation some years ago. Mr. K.