Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : HEB, Hemispherx Biopharma (AMEX)NEW -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (510)	10/27/1998 12:06:00 AM
From: Marty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 857

"I just thought you might like to know one of the possible reasons why if your stock takes a dump but I guess you'd rather just keep yourself in the dark and piss and moan about Asensio, thinking that he's the only broker or newsletter writer recommending a short." Why would you think that? "And I didn't say that I didn't own the stock. I said "I have no position in this stock one way or the other." " If you don't have a position in this stock ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, doesn't that MEAN that you don't own the stock? ... or have a short position in it? So to say you contributed "evidence" without having an interest seems pretty accurate to me. Alternate opinions are always welcome as long as they contribute something. Kibbitzers, without a stake of any kind are, well, not really in the game.

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (510)	10/27/1998 8:51:00 AM
From: The Street	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 857

Funny-- The CDC and the NIH say CFIDS is real...

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (510)	10/27/1998 9:35:00 AM
From: Gerald Underwood	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 857

Don't impute thoughts into my post. I never said a word about Assensio or any other source or that shorts or anyone is not welcome to post on this thread. My point is that no one ever posts or frequents a board without a motive, generally a financial one. If you shorted the stock, just say so, rather than posing disinterest. Then we can consider the source and motive when we analyze your so called evidence rather than accept it as being objective. Disinterested parties never interest me.