SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: antibash who wrote (9459)10/26/1998 11:20:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
Not one of them has a clue to the actual case.

Do you? You haven't ordered a transcript of the filings and rulings to date.

You're a funny bunny, Auntie: you post and post, never say a damned thing. Just endlessly repeat the Party Line. Has it ever occurred to you that just maybe you're missing something here?



To: antibash who wrote (9459)10/27/1998 7:08:00 AM
From: tonto  Respond to of 26163
 
Not tantalizing information. It has been posted on several occasions.

The question I posed was, if they change to ANTI, will you be an antibash(er)?

techstocks.com

anti=ANTI (I know you understand this)



To: antibash who wrote (9459)10/27/1998 8:10:00 AM
From: Diver  Respond to of 26163
 
AB:

First of all, I'm happy to admit that most of my DD went on back when information was, ahem, unclear regarding who was on the AZNT board, the status of the "Export" License, the "Trademarks", etc. The stock ran up a bit and I was happy to take a buck out on the momentum (such as it was).

I'm happy to take the flak on this but IMHO the whole mess surrounding AZNT really appears to be who is the bigger set of crooks?

I gotta tell ya: You can rag on Janice, jhild, tonto, Jeff Mitchell, etc. all you want but at least they've got the stones to go out and procure documents, scan originals and post 'em for others to view. All of those mouth-breathing posts by Spider and Rico when added to B "Good Day Sir" Mart and unsubstantiated posts by yourself lend Zero credibility to your position.

Now, have they been flawless in their position, no. But, when you stack up the overall score on the issues, it's clear (to me) who has presented the better case in the public's eye.

So, if you would like to convince me otherwise, post some content.... I'm pretty open-minded.

Diver