Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (9478)	10/27/1998 1:35:00 AM
From: marcos	Respond to of 26163

Yeah, that's from the post I linked to. You say you're not a pumpster accomplice? - look at this - "Riley doesn't mislead" #reply-2359648 - rofl Ellen, just because I don't post over there doesn't mean I'm not familiar with the sick joke that is rmil, or with its demented hypesters. I did pull it up quite randomly, from this range; techstocks.com Your posts are throughout that thread .... here, let's go to the 500 range and pick your first post on that list - #reply-2351507 "My opinion is there may be more than just SI laws being broken here." Rofl - 'laws broken'? For what, questioning the value of some frantically-promoted non-reporting bulletin board paper? Same old, same old. Even this in your post to me just now; "...think hard before posting that to me again." - Ellen, a person has to think hard around here just to avoid falling asleep from boredom at the sameness of the pumpster refrains. So don't worry -g- Ah well, one day your ship will come in. Too bad it'll be named 'La Mar Caribe'. "WRITE OFF OF INVESTMENT IN C.E.A. LINES 3,354,068" sec.gov sec.gov <snicker>

To: Ellen who wrote (9478)	10/27/1998 9:18:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

No, marcos, I am NOT a pumper. And your saying so doesn't make it so. That's where you're sadly mistaken, as I have learned. Ellen: have you felt you have been completely fair to both yeas and nays on both stocks? Have you weighed both possibilities equally? Or is it possible that you are misleading people in the name of self interest? Maybe I should ask this question: is the OVIS newbie post that you conjured up completely unbiased towards both sides, Ellen? To say that you're a cheerleader would again hide behind the "veil of ignorance." You're not merely a cheerleader, as evidenced in the namecalling. Notice how every single one of those people did not stand up for your economic self-interest, which can only prove that you are biased in some aspect, doesn't it? BTW: to the board, I told them to go into #daytraders and tell them about HRCT. They have skewed the story so many times it has become folklore. However, HRCT is a legitimate company, which is why Ellen and co. are angry with me. They only pump companies without a prayer. :o)