SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Read-Rite -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stitch who wrote (4185)10/27/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: Mark Oliver  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5058
 
<<Actually, during the last conference call management indicated that the trend towards fewer heads per drive might be reversing.>>

I heard this also and it seemed to be said with reservation. They said it could have been because they were improving their product mix and getting more heads into higher end drives. They saw this increase as a contradiction, but that would be an explanation.

What do you think of Fujitsu going GMR now. Will they have shortages, low yields, etc that will be a product of racing ahead with new technology, or have they got the processes in place to make a smooth transition?

Can other drive makers expect a similar experience?

Who will benefit from this move to higher end components? Obviously, RDRT is not the only maker of GMR. Do you think Fujitsu will be kicking the others in the butt to keep up, or will they be satisfied with MR a little longer? Do you think RDRT has any chance of getting into Fujitsu?

Is there any difference between an enterprise head and desktop head? Seems like they should be the same, but just slightly higher on the technology curve thereby getting higher prices and perhaps more heads in a drive.

Regards,

Mark



To: Stitch who wrote (4185)10/29/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: Z Analyzer  Respond to of 5058
 
<<I noticed that and it has sent me searching with not much feedback yet. For the same
reason that Jeff mentioned I would have guessed that the decline in head/media count
would continue. It was the rapid advent of MR that caused the decline to accelerate in
the first place. Why wouldn't GMR do the same especially since it appears Fujitsu and
IBM are moving rapidly to those heads? I am still asking and will post whatever I learn.
Would welcome comments from anyone else.>>
The best guess I would have is that higher growth in the high platter count enterprise drives could be more than offsetting reduced platters in the desktop. Which raises the question of what percent of RDRT's production is enterprise oriented.



To: Stitch who wrote (4185)10/30/1998 6:29:00 PM
From: La Traguhs  Respond to of 5058
 
Stitch,

A late response to your Oct 27th post - - - -

<<Actually, during the last conference call management indicated that the trend towards fewer heads per drive might be reversing.>>

Yes, that comment was made, but I think you need to put it context of RDRT participating (hopefully) on more enterprise programs which, as you know, eat up dem heads and platters.

Regards,
LT