Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (11358)	10/27/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Borzou Daragahi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Hey Peter, It would depend on my perspective. If I were a slave owner, of course I would want feds protecting me from terrorist abolitionists. By the way, your experiment was performed in reality--look at what the feds did to John Brown and his merry band of abolitionists who engaged law enforcement officials in a bloody shootout. Those who weren't killed in the gunfight were hung from the gallows. Re: Abortion. It would depend on your perspective. If one believed a) that abortion is murder and b) that he/she had the right to impose that view on others in society who might totally disagree, he/she wouldn't favor federal protection of doctors performing abortions and might hail the terrorists who killed such doctors as saints, as freedom fighters. If however, you were among the vast majority of Americans, both politically conservative and liberal, who believe abortion is a matter of personal choice, yes, you would want protection for those doctors who perform legal abortions.