Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Aware, Inc. - Hot or cold IPO? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Melissa McAuliffe who wrote (4498)	10/28/1998 10:55:00 AM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9236

mm You wrote <<Larry-----15 7/8 is just another resistance level. My opinion....fwiw, if awre get the patent, the day it's announced it will move so fast through that you won't even see it happen...>> mm (1) That may happen. (2) But it will not cost me any thing ! (3) I'll still wait (4) My method is very low risk . Larry Dudash

To: Melissa McAuliffe who wrote (4498)	10/28/1998 11:19:00 AM
From: bill c.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9236

Melissa, Ok, to further this conversation lets assume Aware has the key patent to enable standard G.Lite/G.992.2. Pairgain has a Falcon DMT chip which will support G.Lite/C992.2. What will Aware get from Pairgain? Pairgain is certainly aware of the pending Aware patent and how it relates to licensing costs. It's in Pairgains best interest to work on the details of this licensing before voting "Yes" to the Aware contributions in G.Lite/C992.2. This would be true with TI, ALA, LU, etc. So the real question is: What is the licensing agreement between Aware and the chip manufactures that need to support G.Lite?