Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gord Bolton who wrote (8827)	10/28/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

MGJ + %40

To: Gord Bolton who wrote (8827)	10/28/1998 7:56:00 PM
From: donkeyman	Respond to of 26850

Gord: That was good stuff you reported on that Major General news release! Pulling that 12m sample from a "shallow instead of a deep lake" is excellent news. It looks like you were correct. If 80 kilograms contain 75 diamonds, one ton or a 1000 kilograms would contain 937 diamonds - 12.5 times more. So lets say DeBeers in a week or two report that those 75 diamonds contain 5 macros, (that's not impossible) that would mean 62 macros per ton.( I never heard tell of that before) Dia Mets $1 billion mine is only reporting 1 carat per ton, and big bucks are made on that. We'll have to keep our fingers crossed Major General, Ascot and Monopros scrape up a few macros in that excellent sample from Snowy Oil. If that turns out to be the case, maybe we can draw the conclusion that the further north you go in the NWT, the RICHER the diamond pipes.!! How is that for a plus for Victoria Island? What a crying shame they only had a shallow drill (12m) on that lake, that lake looked like the JACK-POT to me.??????