Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Global Intellicom--Symbol GBIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David E. Meyer who wrote (996)	10/29/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: R. Gates	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1096

A little g-bit of info: I spoke with John Destler with GBIT Investor Relations yesterday. He indicated that there is some pretty intense financial negotiations going on to make the whole issue of the convertible preferred much less of an issue. He also said that the IGHS/GBIT merger is still very much a real possibility and both companies are working out the details of it. He also said that everyone would be very pleased with the 3rd quarter results. Finally he said that the SEC was looking into some possibly illegal shorting of this company. Some of those associated with the convertible preferred may have been involved with shorting this stock so that the price would be driven way below the convertible price expecting to make millions of dollars on their conversions. This is illegal, and the SEC is aware of this, according to John. John was very confident, and said the company was taking every measure it could (including the above mentioned financing) to return shareholder value to this stock. He said we might get a press release about new financing arrangements even before earnings come out in a few weeks. Best Regards, R. Gates ps- also it seems that GBIT is trying to distance itself from Liberty, though John didn't say that. The fact that I was referred to him and and not Liberty for shareholder info is a good sign considering the SEC charges against Liberty. No wonder Tom Raack at Liberty won't return my phone calls or talk with me when I call!

To: David E. Meyer who wrote (996)	10/30/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: Liberty Capital	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1096

Liberty Capital Group, Inc. and J. Greig (collectively "LCG") acknowledge that on October 28, 1998, they were each named in a federal action filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the federal district court for the Western District of Washington. The sole statutory provision allegedly violated, section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, is a disclosure provision regarding fees paid by LCG's customers to LCG. The SEC's complaint presents only the SEC's version of events. LCG has always taken seriously its disclosure obligations under the securities laws. LCG denies that it has violated any provision of the federal securities laws. LCG has retained experienced securities counsel and intends to vigorously defend against the allegations contained in the complaint. Bradford J. Lam Attorney at Law