To: Anthony Wong who wrote (6170 ) 10/29/1998 6:16:00 PM From: BigKNY3 Respond to of 9523
Five Strong Stocks Power Large-Cap Funds Dan Moreau 10/28/98 Investor's Business Daily Page B1 Several Portfolio Managers Explain Why They're Hanging On Microsoft, General Electric, Pfizer, Cisco Systems, Warner- Lambert. Consider them gilt-edged blue chips. These are among the big-cap stocks that drove the market to record highs for more than two years through last July. They also powered most of the big-cap growth mutual funds, according to Morningstar research analyst Michael Baass. Baass searched a universe of 348 large-cap growth funds to find the most widely held stocks by dollar amount as a percentage of the portfolio. The widespread presence of these blue chips in funds is significant. Such institutions have a big impact on the fate of these stocks. Microsoft represented 3.4% of the 348 funds' total net assets and was a holding in 295 funds. The world's largest software maker, Microsoft shares are up more than 60% this year. An antitrust trial that began last week in Washington seems to have had little impact on Microsoft's long-term outlook among fund managers. GE is in 234 of the funds and represents 2.75% of the funds' assets. GE is a puzzle of various businesses run by what many analysts believe is the best management team in the world and best corporate leader - Jack Welch. Pfizer is in 262 of the funds and accounts for 2.47% of fund dollars. Pfizer's Viagra potency drug was a huge success. But the company is known for the strength of its pipeline of drugs. Cisco, in 298 of the funds and the most widely held, represents 2.26% of their assets. Cisco is the leading builder of the Internet highway and one of the great growth stories of the '90s. Drug maker Warner-Lambert is in 208 of the funds and accounts for 1.55% of fund dollars. Considered an up-and-comer, Warner-Lambert shares have nearly doubled this year on the strength of several successful recent drug introductions. The list is not a copy of the top five of the S&P 500, where Exxon, Merck and Intel take up the next positions after Microsoft and GE. The discrepancy is probably best explained by the higher earnings growth rates of Pfizer, Cisco and Warner-Lambert. There are common benchmarks and attributes that explain much of their popularity, and growth tops the list for many fund managers. "I own all of them," said Ken Corba, manager of Heritage Growth Equity Fund. He bought shares because the companies match his investment philosophy. "I want to own wealth-creating businesses," he said. "So I look for high growth rates, high profit margins and high predictability of earnings. "Microsoft is a 25% grower, Cisco is 30%, Warner-Lambert is 23% and growing. GE Chairman Jack Welch has GE so finely calibrated he delivers solid earnings every quarter." Corba said he is also looking for companies where "the future is as bright as the past. "I owned Philip Morris and sold it," he said. "Philip Morris clearly is fighting a defensive battle, and their future is not as bright. Cisco's future is even brighter than its past." For Fritz Reynolds, manager of Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund, up 23% this year, said he owns all five because "you find the No. 1 stock in a growth industry and bet it will stay No. 1. It's like a course in probabilities," he said. "Twenty years ago, it was chemicals and paper, now it is health care and tech companies," he added. "My only hope is that they don't get ahead of themselves in share price and I would have to sell them." T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund manager Larry Puglia also owns all five companies. Warner-Lambert is the top holding in the portfolio. "It has the best organic growth in the pharmaceutical business," he said. "And like the others in this group, it has seasoned management. "All these companies know how to manage expenses and how to allocate capital to the highest-return business," he added. For John Wilson, manager of State Street Research Trust, the key to understanding performance is not only dominance in their field, but how they meet expectations. "They are in almost all cases meeting or exceeding the numbers for earnings growth and revenue growth," he said. "That is not exactly a common occurrence. That means they are growing at a very high rate." Their very size makes a difference, too, says Jeffrey Lindsey. He is portfolio manager for Putnam Growth Opportunities Fund. "Big companies can be successful because of their size," he explained. "They can use that power to extend their growth. They can buy out or hurt smaller companies in their industry. It's no accident that these companies continue to perform well."