Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (23495)	10/28/1998 6:53:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

Not 90%... AOL did not have 90% in its earliest days. Compuserv and Prodigy were roughly equivalent. AOL started to pull away from the pack around 95-96. DocStone

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (23495)	10/29/1998 3:08:00 AM
From: Tie Zeng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

I just want to repeat one more times. AOL was in much worse situation than AMZN is. AOL didn't have 90% market share in the early days. It might have 9% percent at best, if not 0.9%. It is very small, even tiny compared to its competitors, like CompuServe. And Prodigy had a couple of giants as its daddy. And AOL did not make any money for a long, long, long , long time. AOL even had to face MSFT's direct competition. Pleaes try to get the facts correct. It is your own money to lose. I hvae never seen any stock's bears so uncareful about facts than AMZN's. Tie