Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Netscape -- Giant Killer or Flash in the Pan? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Croci who wrote (4379)	10/29/1998 11:12:00 AM
From: E. Graphs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4903

Microsoft case: AOL says browser choice not ''technical'' dailynews.yahoo.com >>Colburn said that as the Internet became more and more important, AOL was looking for a Web browser to package with its product. >>Microsoft lawyer John Warden asked Colburn, a witness for the government, why his company had chosen to go with Microsoft rather than Netscape in March, 1996. >>''Isn't it a fact that the most important factor in choosing between Microsoft and Netscape was getting software that worked with your client?'' Warden asked, using the word ''client'' to mean the software AOL provided to its customers. >>''No,'' replied Colburn. ''There were five factors. The most important in my mind, as the lead negotiator, was securing parity with MSN.'' He said that the other priorities were, in order, how much AOL would have to pay, whether the Web browser would work with the widely distributed Microsoft Windows, its flexibility of use with other browsers and, last, whether the technology worked. >>But Colburn also rejected the idea that Microsoft had better technology. >>''Isn't it a fact that at the time Microsoft offered the best technological solution for your subscribers?'' asked Warden. ''The answer would be no,'' replied Colburn. >>Warden asked if Microsoft's browser technology was superior because it was written in modules, which could be tailored to fulfil specific software needs, rather than in one big chunk like Netscape's browser. >>''No,'' replied Colburn. Colburn said Microsoft had made its browser in components only for Windows 95, which was used by only 20 percent of his subscribers at the time.<<