Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Thermo Tech Technologies (TTRIF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dbmedia who wrote (4937)	10/29/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: Laura E.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6467

looks like it will close at .25

To: dbmedia who wrote (4937)	10/29/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Clement	Respond to of 6467

Donald, It would seem that I have misjudged you if what you are saying is correct. Thank you for your clarification. I hope you will forgive me of my cynicism, however given the circumstances, I'm not sure I would not have done it again. You featured Thermo Tech at a miserable time in its development. As we speak, there is an attempt at a dissident uprising with the AGM being tomorrow. There have been many irregularities in trading, and even accounting transactions when it has come to Thermo Tech and even questionable promotional activities. It is undeniable that due to these activities many people have been hurt. In the latest development, Thermo Tech's current management has attempted to sue the leaders of the dissident proxy fight. When you originally posted I took it as the same type of hype that so many investors, who should not have been into Thermo Tech in the first place, bought into. The problem with Thermo Tech is that their story is a convincing one, and the idea is terrific, yet the follow through has been horrifically inept. There are many including myself who believe that it is probable that there were securities regulations violations in the promotion and public disclosure of Thermo Tech (including the assumption of some monikers on the internet to pose as mere "investors"). It has taken a very painful process for many people to see beyond the "dream" as propagated by the company's management and continued through the use of your program. When it was learned that your company was cited by the SEC, given the background of Thermo Tech I lept to the wrong conclusion. I hope that if you had known better you would not have allowed the feature on Thermo Tech to take place without more information as to the "darker" side of Thermo Tech. I wish you luck and success in putting this undoubtedly painful saga behind you. Clement