Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (52914)	10/29/1998 11:36:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Ellen, He accused me numerous times the past few days of being a "pumper", yet when I asked him to prove it, he couldn't. There are no inaccuracies with this statement, except for a provision. I cannot prove that you are a "pumper" in the manner that you have defined, ie, going to other boards and showing enthusiasm for a stock, or asking other people to hype it. But I remind you that your definition is not along the guidelines of that which JMO has just recently defined as a "pumper." In other words, the word, "pumper" is open to interpretation. As for not substantiating my definition, I believe I did type out a post in which I outlined several posts that fit my definition of "pumping" rather well. Those that view my post can and will make their own assessments. I will no longer call you a "pumper" because I am giving you the benefit of the doubt. But do not inaccurately state that I didn't show you what I thought and still think to be pumping. He also accused me of lying about the log of the irc incident - when he asked those in there to help him hype HRTC. There are two inaccuracies with this statement. Nowhere did I accuse you of lying about the log of the irc incident. I am suggesting that perhaps in an attempt to crucify me, you have distorted the truth. And secondly, I never, ever, ever, in my entire life, asked anyone to hype HRTC. Matty doesn't realize what an irresponsible loose cannon he is or that he is responsible for what he posts. I would like a response from you on a question I will pose. An irresponsible loose cannon would presuppose that anything I have said in the past couple days is something that I know is libelous. I have told you that I don't consider being a "pumper" a bad thing. It is not of my concern that you do, and I know that sounds somewhat cold. But if you actually sit down and think about it... a "pumper" is not anything bad, nor is it illegal. If you "pump" a stock, then you are showing its positives. There has never been a stock that I have been in that I have not pumped (hey, the sheer fact that I'm in a stock means that I like it), but there has never been a stock that I have not seen negatives on, and posted about them. I am still very angry about his wildly flinging out statements just to be making them. He shows that he hasn't learned much from his "swaysayer" days. Guess those "swaysayer" days aren't over for him. There is one inaccuracy that I know of in this statement. I don't make statements for the simple fact of making them. If you read my apology, you would understand that I make them because I want to find out what the underlying meaning is behind them. I think I have found a way to get at them, but I need response from you. You have called me many things which are libelous. I have called you something that is not illegal, imo not libelous, either. Because you take it as libelous, I will stop. But you have done nothing in the past few days to try to analyze what I have said, partially because the way in which I have presented it has been somewhat aggressive. I think that's the problem. Perhaps what I've been doing is for... a greater understanding of something...? <g> Keep in mind, I've written analytical papers on you guys... i may understand your online personalities perhaps better than you. The Evil Dead