Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocky510 who wrote (1514)	10/29/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2251

Hello Jimmy Whether MGJ has released information based on preliminary and/or verbal communication in the past was not my point. The fact that they would by the way, does not speak highly of their professionalism in my humble opinion, but regardless. It has been my observation that DBs is very strict about what information is released and typically insists on vetting NRs attributed to them or involving them in detail, prior to issuance. The fact that this does not seem to be the case here (or in the past) strikes me as very very unusual. Perhaps the diamonds were microscopic and perhaps did say so but we can not tell that from this release. I am not saying that MGJ fabricated this conversation or that a DB staffer did not pass along this information. What I am saying is that this is corporately out of character for DBs both to release preliminary information and incomplete information. It is not unusual for many Canadian juniors to pump their stock with preliminary or partial information and as we all know, all too often false information. Whether the latter is or is not the case here I can not say but I distrust companies that make me guess. I am glad the companies assurance gives you peace but as Sargent Friday said "Just the facts Mam". The rest is minyana(sp?)... Be cautious is all I suggest. For what its worth, you may have noted that CC (James) assigned no recommendation to this play based on this news release. Regards