SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (11613)10/29/1998 2:10:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I have nothing against competition between schools. If there is a way to make public schools compete, Im all for it. I just dont favor privitization of the entire elementary school system.

But if the republicans insist on vouchers, and they pass, then my next gripe (yes I do have one suprise) is that the voucher is enough money to actually send a kid to a private school for a year. Weve got this nutcase in Ca that is advocating vouchers and the dollar amount is $700 for the year or something like that. You cant send a kid to a decent private school for that. How can anybody that promotes this bogus concept live with themselves is what I want to know.



To: Les H who wrote (11613)10/29/1998 2:29:00 PM
From: Borzou Daragahi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I would guess that private universities probably also are exempt from local income taxes and property taxes.

You're right. Non-profit educational and religious institutions such as churches or colleges don't pay property tax. As for income tax, they are non-profit, i.e. non-income.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News