Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (9862)	10/29/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Maybe it's because she really believes that "The new TA will have to reconcile the outstanding shares, float, and those currently in street name, PLUS ALL THE UNDECLARED SHORTS!!!!" #reply-2355075 :-)

To: Janice Shell who wrote (9862)	10/30/1998 7:06:00 AM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 26163

You said: lolololololololololol wink twitch ROFLMAO!!! Ellen Discusses the Stock and the Company? Stops whining exclusively about Posters She Doesn't Like? That'll be the day! I mean I KNOW how fond she is of Pugs and Riley from RMIL, but am hard-pressed to understand her urgent need to promote every alleged short-squeeze in the making. You really DID have trouble following along on all those posts, didn't you? And, this irresponsible post of yours is extreme, even for you. And quite foolish, actually. Tsk Tsk, Janice. No, I'm not "braindead" as you posted on the Thread Morons thread. Sure, I've made a couple of human errors, who never has? YOU? LOL!!! At least I haven't done what you stupidly did, which was to KNOWINGLY STATE AS FACT(S) THAT WHICH YOU HADN'T EVEN LOOKED UP, BUT STATED AS "FACT" ANYWAY. AND, THEY WEREN'T TRUE. And, please DO explain how calling you on that is "whining". Can you explain that? Also, please DO explain how pointing out Janice & co's abrasiveness and sarcasm, etc. is "whining". Can you explain that? Now, this part of your post is REALLY rich - her urgent need to promote every alleged short-squeeze in the making. Can you explain on what basis you make THAT statement? Any basis AT ALL? You are looking more and more foolish Janice. And what I posted to Paul is EQUALLY, if not more, appropriate for YOU. -------------------- #reply-6208959 To: Paul Casolo (9781 ) From: Ellen Thursday, Oct 29 1998 11:10AM ET Reply # of 9957 You are a fool if you think innuendo carries weight. Innuendo IS crap. It means NOTHING. By its very nature, innuendo is NOT FACT. Innuendo is NOT REALITY. "Dream of" credibility like yours...? Who says you have it? You? Stop hiding behind your innuendo. Go for it. Prove it. Or don't prove that your innuendo is any more than just THAT and lose that "credibility" which seems to be so dear to you. Just why do those - like you - who NEED to feel "big" or "important" think they have a right to say just any ole thing - INNUENDO - about someone else and not have to back it up? Why do people like you think they can make something so just by saying that it is? Well, it DOESN'T make it so. More often than not, if looked at deeply enough, it turns out to be just a stupid (for some equally stupid reason) personal vendetta. So don't hide. Prove it. -------------------- Just keep digging that hole you're in bigger Janice. Keep on making your foolish comments. You aren't making me look bad, you're making yourself look bad.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (9862)	10/30/1998 7:15:00 AM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 26163

You should also read this. It applies to you. #reply-6206197 zonkie (9744 ) From: Ellen Thursday, Oct 29 1998 8:28AM ET Reply # of 9958 Maybe you can fool people like Ellen and Cavalry but they are searching for the pot at the end of the rainbow. That's enough of your bs zonkie. You don't know squat about what stocks I do or don't own. You don't know squat about me so you have no basis, no grounds, no knowledge, no NOTHING on which to make such a statement. Not sure why I bother to point this out, except maybe to get it off my chest, because any person with any history of time spent on SI is well aware of bashers' methods and tactics. Which are, of course, to sling insults as often as possible and with as much "wit" as possible, irregardless of basis. You all seem to think this is a battleground of wit and whoever can appear the most clever has automatically "won". Well, you all have a sick sense of what IS wit or clever. To all of you, wit isn't what is genuinely clever, it is the "best dig". And you are all so HYPOCRITICAL. You, smartin, Tonto, Janice, etc, etc, jump with absolute glee if you can point out a dig or mistake (like none of you ever make one?) made by someone not in your "group". But, geez, look around you. This whole thread is nothing but digs and insults and condescension and sarcasm, etc, etc - MOST of which is from all of YOU. It is rare, if ever, to read even a SINGLE post from any one of you that ISN'T an insult. Spare us all your hypocrisy.