Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (52979)	10/30/1998 12:05:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Respond to of 55532

Matty: Is Ron Reece starting to write your posts, now? Tell the truth... It's close to Christmas, and Santa's watching. No, Ron isn't writing my posts, and there is no such thing as Santa Claus. Ron is the only one that I have seen on SI so far that can turn a simple answer into a justifable reason to commit suicide rather than finish reading the darn thing. I don't understand. You stated that you knew what the real world was really like. I showed a flaw in the combining of state and the "real world" as the same thing. You present to me?? That's what a female monkee does at the zoo, when she wants to get monkee L**d. I try to stay away from monkees they're always stealing my cookies. or..Is that one of those "I opine" phrases, that the debating team uses? Matty.. If you're going to continue to make those substitute for quaalude posts, I insist that you address them paul c..he'll probably love them... He (due to the mistaken identity syndrome) will probably think he's WM F. Buckley, and respond. I don't understand the rest of this post... you have to somehow elaborate. If my reasoning of what the different kinds of experts we have in this world was wrong, then please, tell me that it is wrong, and show me how. I thought that this was what the conversation was about. I'm not justifying anything, and I'm not trying to find answers that answer your accusations. This seperation of situational expert and certified expert was a major point in my paper. Just answer this question if you don't want to sift through my commentary: Does my portrayal of the two types of experts show a closer practical application to what actually transpires in the "real world" than your portrayal of the expert? IE, do my two types of experts cover more of what is deemed as "expertise" than your classification of an expert? If you wish to say "bull," fine. But a healthy debate is one in which people retract statements they once said, like I did with your "court of law" synopsis. The Evil Dead