Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (34343)	10/30/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Doug.... Thanks for your efforts. Read your post. Didn't realize that Zeeveeeee had his own thread. So appropriate that Larry started it and is over there with him. I think they let him back on SI too quick. They should have banned him for at least a year.<g> Keep up the good work. It's appreciated. Joe

To: d:oug who wrote (34343)	10/30/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 35569

larry, <<..IF YOU ARE AN IPM SHAREHOLDER AND DESIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND A PROXY LETTER, SEND YOUR REQUEST WITH YOUR NAME AND E-MAIL ADDRESS TO act70344@usa.net..>>> Chuca P.S.- Yes, Zeev is respected...so now Doug and Aaron are thusly respected. Ever read the word defination of Like For Like? Grudge is a negative way and not positive and protective of the well balance and well being. Sure, it applies to others here, but; hell- let it all hang out and ass kick where you want, when you want, and that is your right....or is it...I say you have no right to come back here and pick up where YOU left off with Joe Blowhart ( or what ever his made up name is). Pant On ThatS. Leeward, not windward. Who is really smelling Dog Farts??? ? Woof, snarl, nip. Who is the dog chasing, who is the second nippersnapper that could of stopped, or can you...stop. We will see.

To: d:oug who wrote (34343)	10/31/1998 6:11:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Opposite, opposing, contrary, flamboyant, babble, hype and even obviously wrong to all but poster's, are accepted and tolerated. Shorts may even post lies to counter hype and threaders may flame each other. But personnel attacks between individual threaders disrupt the flow and prevent SI members from posting or even reading the thread. Maby each thread needs its own localized police committee that can speak for the thread to the SI police. Spitful and personnel posts to inflame another, even if containing on topic information, can be monitored and recorded and warning given. The following are my thoughts only. I found this on SI home page but cannot locate article. If can locate article, please post on Maxam thread. Exclusive: Silicon Investor's Sheriff Lady departs Jill McKinney, all-powerful Webmistress of Silicon Investor's raucous bulletin boards, tells Money.com why she is hanging up her holster Doug

To: d:oug who wrote (34343)	10/31/1998 6:13:00 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 35569

TO ALL IPM SHAREHOLDERS: REFERENCE: MAXAM/IPM POSSIBLE MERGER To: Aaron R. Cathcart (34348 ) From: Aaron R. Cathcart Friday, Oct 30 1998 6:41PM ET Reply # of 34353 ################################################# Please note the new E-Mail Address until Further Notice. act70344@usa.net ################################################# THE PROPOSED MERGER REMAINS ACTIVE !!!!!!!!! IF YOU ARE AN IPM SHAREHOLDER AND DESIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND A PROXY LETTER, SEND YOUR REQUEST WITH YOUR NAME AND E-MAIL ADDRESS TO act70344@usa.net WE NEED YOUR PROXIES IN FAVOR OF THIS MERGER WHICH WILL RECOVER SOME VALUE FOR OUR EXISTING IPM SHARES. Thanks for helping us to help us all.