SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe Master who wrote (52991)10/30/1998 9:11:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Only an idiot would own a stock find out it is a scam expose it, and then sell his/her shares. Of course you
would sell them first expose them later.


Ahem... I did that with Zulu. :op

Of course, I was way in the profit zone at that point. But I wouldn't have found out there were strange things going on with it if I wasn't in the profit zone; that's what made Wired Magazine pick up the story.

The Evil Dead



To: Joe Master who wrote (52991)10/30/1998 9:33:00 AM
From: DJ Byrne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
Joe,

But according to tonto and smartin you would not let this happen, you would immediately blow the whistle to prevent other people from buying, because that is the prime directive. According to you it is make yourself money and then later blow the whistle according to your new agenda.
Doesn't sound much different from their accusations of the people they are bashing.

dj



To: Joe Master who wrote (52991)10/30/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Joe: I would 100% sell any stock that I decided was a scam.

However, I doubt if I would then go on a board and try and hurt someone else's money..

Except as payback to someone that I felt was trying to hurt me.
FWIW..I don't believe in "turning the other cheek".

I have NEVER just gone on a thread and sat on it knocking people's money.

I may have made a post or two on a thread, voicing an opposite opinion..but then I felt I had said my piece, and now it was time to move on.
The people there are all adults, and can do what they want.

Besides, what is true today, may not be true tomorrow, and I have other things to concern myself with than a stock that I have no interest in.

RMIL I always had an interest in..I liked most of the people, (both sides) and there was always a chance that if the company got itself straightened out, a squeeze could happen.
Remember even Mike and I think tonto admitted that they thought that the shareholders probably did own the float.




To: Joe Master who wrote (52991)10/30/1998 11:42:00 AM
From: DJ Byrne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
4. RMIL really does/did produce water and clothing.

They must have had those plants for whatever time to do something with and as for the water, I believe it would have flown if it wasn't stalled by the constant barrage of posters disparaging RMIL and the halt.

If the Y2k problem is half as big as they say it will be, bottled water will be in demand as That is all I drink and cook with now, as many other people do in this area and other areas of the US.

dj