Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (11765)	10/30/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Thin skinned coward. Childish behavior. No "direct name calling" there, no sirree. Very creative. You deny the threat? I didn't say it was terrible or anything, I said it was a threat. What bad ending were you referring to, my friend? You think I was frightened? I'll repeat what I wrote back in private: Oh, I'm scared. Liar. I guess I have to repost my little collection of a few hours posts from you, Bill. Polite as they all were. While you're busy pontificating on the conflicts in your troubled life, how about an answer to my question. Where and when did George Bush lie under oath? (Remember that hateful wild ranting accusatory post of yours?) Just wondering. Look, I'm not your shrink. Go rant to someone else. Just tell me when and where George Bush lied under oath, as you have alleged. So, you admit that you invented that stuff about Bush lying under oath. Is that what you're telling me? Are you telling this thread that you are a liar? Or are you telling this thread that you are ignorant? Nice tone. Again, take that to your shrink. What's this "I'll get back to you" stuff? You made a declarative statement and now you have to go back and look it up? Why don't you tell us what you meant by your statement that Bush lied under oath? Was it your lie or your ignorance that produced that bit of mythology? A person with integrity would have admitted he made up the statement, "and George Bush lied under oath." And an apology for being so blindly partisan that you lied to make a point would be in order. But liars beget liars, I guess. And people with no integrity are respected by the same. That explains your hateful existence. Have you no shame? Cease with the endless drivel and equivocating. You have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have lied when you said: "and Bush lied under oath." You can't even point to an instance where Bush was PUT UNDER OATH! Case closed. You lied. Admit it. Where is your integrity? And you complain about people attacking you? Who said this? You did. You're a real piece of work, liar. You lied about Bush lying under oath. You have no shame or integrity to admit it. And thank you for the "apology". I cut out my own quotes from the above, not that I deny them. But these are all your words, oh polite paragon of integrity. And they're not the worst I've gotten from you, by any means. As for the higher level, that's fine with me. I don't particularly like your level, or JLA's level, creative and humorous though you may find it. Just as you claim the above to be polite, apparently. Maybe you want to give your definition of "direct name calling" while you're at it. I apologize to all for misconstruing the Rush Limbaugh style of politeness in the above quotations. It's all a joke, really. Just like the SNL / Leno "poll", right, Bill? And note that your "liar" search wasn't very effective. Maybe there's something wrong with the SI search engine?